Abstract
E-mail Abstract Author
Add To Itinerary
Session
Search Abstracts
Program


Session 64 Poster Session
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Session Time: 4:30-6:30 pm
Room 4E-F

  450-W.

The Interim Analysis of a Phase IV Randomised, Open-Label, Multicentre Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Indinavir/Ritonavir (800/100 mg BID) vs Saquinavir/Ritonavir (1000/100 mg MID) in Adult HIV-1 Infection: MaxCmin1 Trial
A. Castagna*, U. B. Dragsted, J-P. Chave, A. Rieger, G. Carosi, S. van der Geest, H. Nielsen, and J. D. Lundgren for the MaxCmin1 Trial Group
Co-ordinating Office for the MaxCmin1 Trial, Copenhagen HIV Programme (CHIP), Denmark

Background: The MaxCmin1 trial is the first head-to-head comparison of ritonavir (r)-boosted PI treatments. MaxCmin1 primarily compares the virological failure rate at 48 weeks for the indinavir(IND)/r arm relative to the saquinavir(SAQ)/r arm.

Methods: Open-label, randomised (1:1), multicentre, phase IV trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of IND/r (800/100-mg BID) versus SAQ/r (1000/100-mg BID) in adult HIV-1-infected patients with clinical indication for a ritonavir-boosted PI regimen. Use of NRTI/NNRTI was decided prior to randomisation by the treating physician. One scheduled intention-to-treat (ITT) interim analysis was done on all week-24 data from subjects exposed to the study drugs. The ITT analysis was done using the Peto method of repeated significance with a significance level of 0.001.

Results: Beginning September 2000, 317 patients were randomised of whom 306 initiated treatment. Patients are primarily Caucasian (83%) men (78%) infected through sex with other men (49%). At 24 weeks, 13% (IND/r) vs 16% (SAQ/r) experienced virological failure. No difference was seen in viral suppression through 24 weeks (table). At weeks 4, 12, and 24, the CD4 T-cell count increase from baseline was 30, 43, and 40 (IND/r) and 33, 42, and 58 cells/mm3 (SAQ/r). Time to increase of >100 CD4 T cells/mm3 was 13 (12) weeks mean (median; n=69) for IND/r and 12 (5) weeks mean (median; n=62) for SAQ/r. No statistically significant difference was seen between the study arms in number (%) of grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs).

 

Table 1 % with HIV-1 RNA < 100 copies/mL

 

SAQ/r (N =148)

%

IND/r (N = 158)

%

Baseline

36

35

Week 4

48

47

Week 12

66

61

Week 24

71

66

 

Conclusions: In the interim analysis at 24 weeks of this randomised trial no differences were observed in virological or immunological response to the 2 ritonavir-boosted study PIs nor in the proportion of patients with grade 3/4 AEs. No changes are warranted in the conduct of the trial following the Data and Safety Monitoring Board’s evaluation of the week 24 data. Final results available in third quarter 2002.


©2002 9th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections