Abstract
E-mail Abstract Author
Add To Itinerary
Session
Search Abstracts
Program


Session 77 Poster Session
Resistance Testing in Drug Selection
Session Time: 4:30-6:30 pm
Room 4E-F

  582-T.

Structural Phenotype Predicts HIV-1 Protease Inhibitor Resistance
M. Shenderovich*1, R. Kagan2, K. Ramnarayan1, P. Hess2, and P. Heseltine2
1Structural Bioinformatics Inc., San Diego, CA and2 Quest Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, CA

Background:  Mutations in HIV-1 drug targets lead to resistance and consequent therapeutic failure.  Rules-based interpretations may not accurately predict the effects of multiple mutations, while phenotypic assays are time consuming and costly.  To improve resistance prediction, we developed a structural phenotyping procedure that models HIV-1 protease inhibitor complexes and rapidly evaluates binding affinities of protease inhibitors (PI) to mutant variants.

Methods: Models of wild type Pr-PI complexes were produced by energy optimization of published structures.  Amino acid substitutions were introduced and the models were refined by energy minimization.  Calculated changes in the PI binding energy (DEbind) of mutant vs wild type complexes were correlated with published estimates of the changes in Ebind or the ratios of phenotypic IC50s. Complexes of Pr variants from clinical isolates were modeled with 5 PIs (saquinavir, indinavir, ritonavir, nelfinavir, amprenavir) andEbind cutoffs corresponding to a 5x increase in IC50 (Virologic PhenoSense) used to define a structural phenotype of susceptible, resistant or equivocal.

Results: Significant correlations (r2 = 0.7 - 0.8, p < 0.01) between calculated binding energies and empiric estimates obtained from published Kis were found for saquinavir, indinavir, ritonavir and amprenavir.  Resistance-associated mutations markedly increased (³ 1.5 kcal/mol) Ebind. For 48 Pr variants, calculated Ebind for 4/5 PIs showed significant correlations (r2 = 0.7-0.8, p < 0.001) with fold changes in IC50s (Virco Antivirogram).  For a second group of 46 variants, Ebind for all 5 PIs showed good correlations (r2 = 0.75-0.85, p < 0.001) with fold changes in IC50s (Virologic PhenoSense).  The overall concordance of structurally predicted resistance with phenotype exceeded 80% for both data sets.

Conclusions: A novel computational method for structure-based phenotyping of HIV-1 protease was developed that correlates the binding energies of 5 PIs to HIV-1 Pr and changes in inhibitor IC50s as measured by phenotyping. This method rapidly predicts drug resistance of clinical HIV-1 Pr variants, with an accuracy approaching that of cell-based phenotypic assays.


©2002 9th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections