![]() |
|
|
| Abstract |
|
|
|
|
Session 24
Oral Abstract Session
Antiretroviral Chemotherapy: Pathogenesis of Primary HIV Infection Session Time: Wednesday, 10 am - 12:30 pm Room 6A-B |
Background:
We described a patient with PHI with an MDR virus, who
without receiving
therapy precipitously lost all evidence of resistance in
conjunction with an increase in viral load. Initial sequence analysis revealed
many changes between resistant (strain 1) and susceptible (strain 2) variants
raising the possibility of superinfection. We have
used phylogenetic analysis and estimates of in vivo and in vitro fitness to address this issue. Methods:
Direct consensus PCR-sequencing of pol was
performed on serial samples. Replication capacity (RC) was measured using a
single-cycle assay based on the same amplicon. Motifscan was used to screen for potential CTL epitopes. Results:
Plasma viral load (pVL) was initially 5.5 log10,
declining to 3.0 log10 by day 30. It remained stable until day 110, then increased to
4.5 log10 by day 173, when the switch in phenotype occurred. Phylogenetic analyses on all 1200 nucleotides, or on third
base positions alone, confirmed the 2 viral strains cluster separately among
strains from other PHI patients, indicating co-infection with 2 independent
virus strains. In vitro RC assays
revealed strain 1 had a 4-fold higher fitness in vitro than strain 2. This
fitness advantage is consistent with the success of strain 1 immediately after
infection, but outgrowth of strain 2 after day 110 is inconsistent with the RC
data. From its rate of increase in frequency, we estimate the fitness of strain
2 in vivo is at least 5% higher than
strain 1 at day 110, implying a significant difference between strains in a
fitness component not represented in the in vitro RC assay. We
hypothesized that this outgrowth represented escape from immune control. Class
I HLA typing (A3,24; B35,40) permitted screening of
sequences from strains 1 and 2 for HLA-matched CTL epitopes.
18 potential A3-restricted epitopes were identified,
2 of which were present in the initial sample and missing from the later
sequence and could represent the escape mutations. Conclusions:
We propose
that the patient was co-infected with a drug-susceptible strain and a more fit MDR strain, an
effective immune response was elicited but the susceptible strain subsequently
suffered a mutation in a critical CTL epitope,
permitting outgrowth after day 110. |
|
©2002 9th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections |