Abstract
E-mail Abstract Author
Add To Itinerary
Session
Search Abstracts
Program


Session 62 Poster Session
Pharmacokinetics of Antiretroviral Drugs
Session Time: 4:30-6:30 pm
Room 4E-F

  433-W.

Multiple-Dose Kaletra (Lopinavir/Ritonavir) does not Affect the Pharmacokinetics of the CYP2D6 Probe, Desipramine
R. Bertz*, C. Foit, Y-L. Chiu, B. Bernstein, S. Boller, J. R. Owen, L. Williams, Q. Ji, C. Renz, A. Hsu, G. R. Granneman, and E. Sun
Abbott Labs., Abbott Park, IL

Background: At clinically relevant concentration, the HIV-protease inhibitor lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) inhibits CYP3A in vitro and in vivo, but is predicted to be a very weak inhibitor of CYP2D6 from LPV/r in vitro and previous ritonavir in vivo data. The purpose was to confirm that LPV/r 400/100-mg BID would minimally affect the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the CYP2D6 probe, desipramine (DMI).

Methods: This was an open-label sequential study in 16 healthy males and females; 15 completed the study. Subjects were given a single 100-mg dose of DMI on days 1 and 16. LPV/r 400/100-mg BID was given on days 6-20. Plasma samples were collected for 120-h after each DMI dose; LPV/r samples were obtained over 12-h on day 16. DMI, 2-OH DMI and LPV/r were measured by LC/MS/MS; noncompartmental methods were used for PK. Effect of LPV/r on DMI was assessed by paired t-test; 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the bioavailability of the combination regimen relative to DMI alone were obtained for DMI log-transformed Cmax and AUC.

Results:

Mean (± SD) Point Estimates and 90% CI of Cmax and AUC¥ for DMI + LPV/r (day 16) vs DMI Alone (day 1)

 

 

Relative Bioavailability*

day 16 vs. day 1

 

Mean ± SD (N=15)

Point

 

PK Parameter

day 16

day 1

Estimate

90% CI

Cmax (ng/mL)

29.8 ± 12.5

38.8 ± 8.8

0.905

0.844 – 0.969

AUC¥ (ng·h/mL)

1326 ± 449

1337 ± 741

1.051

0.956 – 1.156

 

* Ratio of geometric means.

The 90% CI for DMI Cmax and AUC were within 0.80 to 1.25, suggesting no significant effect of LPV/r on DMI bioavailability. DMI half-life was similar on days 16 and 1 (22.9 vs 21.2-h) and Tmax occurred slightly later on day 16 (8.5 vs 6.9-h, p=0.034). The 2-OH DMI metabolite Cmax decreased by 34% (19.6 ± 8.7 vs 29. 8 ± 12.5 ng/mL, p<0.001) and AUC¥ decreased by 25% (606 ± 197 vs 808 ± 245-ng•h/mL, p<0.001). Since there was no effect on DMI PK, the slight reduction in 2-OH DMI AUC is likely due to induction of glucuronidation by LPV/r, rather than inhibition of CYP2D6-mediated formation from DMI. Concentration of LPV/r were within the expected range.

Conclusions: Consistent with predictions, LPV/r does not inhibit CYP2D6-mediated metabolism at clinically relevant concentrations.


©2002 9th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections