Abstract
E-mail Abstract Author
Add To Itinerary
Session
Search Abstracts
Program


Session 61 Poster Session
Antiretroviral Chemotherapy in Previously Treated Individuals
Session Time: 4:30-6:30 pm
Room 4E-F

  417-W.

A Week-48 Assessment of High Strength T-20 Formulations in Multi-Class Experienced Patients
L. J. Wheat*1, J. Lalezari2, M. Kilby3, D. Wheeler4, M. Salgo5, R. DeMasi6, and J. Delehanty6
1Indiana Univ., Indianapolis; 2Quest Clin. Res., San Francisco, CA; 3Univ. Alabama, Birmingham; 4Annandale, VA; 5Hoffmann-La Roche, Nutley, NJ; and 6Trimeris, Inc., Durham, NC

Background: The initial 50 mg/mL T-20 carbonate (CO3) formulation required 2 injections BID to deliver a dose of 90 mg BID. High-strength (100 mg/mL) CO3 and TRIS formulations have been developed to reduce the number of daily injections.

Methods: This sequential, cross-over study compared the initial T-20 50 mg/mL CO3 formulation (100 mg BID, 90 mg deliverable) to a T-20 100 mg/mL CO3 formulation (75 mg, 67.5 mg deliverable; and 100 mg BID, 90 mg deliverable) and a 100 mg/mL TRIS formulation (100 mg BID, 90 mg deliverable). All patients received active ARV therapy in addition to T-20. A 28-day steady-state cross-over phase (from high-strength formulations to 50 mg/mL CO3) evaluated pharmacokinetics and tolerability. Afterwards, safety, tolerability, and antiviral activity of the high strength T-20 CO3 and TRIS formulations were observed for 48 weeks. The study was not designed to discriminate among cohorts.

Results:  46 triple-class, treatment-experienced patients participated: 22 in the 100 mg/mL 90 mg BID CO3 cohort, 12 in the 100 mg/mL 67.5 mg BID CO3 cohort, and 12 in the 100 mg/mL 90 mg BID TRIS cohort. The median baseline HIV-1 RNA was 5.37 log10 C/mL, and median CD4+ cell count was 24 cells/mm3. Only 3 (6.5%) patients discontinued before week 48. Pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that the 50 mg/mL and 100 mg/mL CO3 formulations were bioequivalent.  Injection site reactions (ISR) were the most frequent adverse event; all patients experienced at least 1 event, but none discontinued the study due to an ISR. All signs/symptoms occurred more frequently in patients in the TRIS cohort. During the 28-day pharmacokinetic phase, there was a tendency for the severity of ISRs to lessen when patients switched from TRIS to 50 mg/mL CO3 formulations. Besides ISRs, diarrhea, nausea, lymphadenopathy, and nasopharyngitis were the most common AEs. Activity results were:

 

Median (ITT) Week 48 Activity

 

100 mg/mL CO3

100 mg BID

N = 22

100 mg/mL CO3

75 mg BID

N = 12

100 mg/mL TRIS

100 mg BID

N = 12

< 400 C/mL (%)

59

67

17

Log10 change BL

-2.97

-3.48

-0.87

Viral Failure (%)

23

17

58

CD4+ change BL

111

175

79

Conclusions:

The 50 mg/mL and 100 mg/mL CO3 formulations of T-20 were bioequivalent. Although all patients experienced ISRs, no patient discontinued due to ISR. The overall safety profile appeared similar between the 100 mg/mL CO3 and TRIS formulations through 48 weeks. The pharmacokinetics, safety, and activity of T-20 in the 100 mg/mL CO3 formulation support its development in Phase III trials at 2 injections per day.

 


©2002 9th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections