![]() |
|
|
| Abstract |
|
|
|
|
Session 15
Oral Abstract Session
Neuropathogenesis Session Time: Tuesday, 10 am - 12:30 pm Room 606-609 |
Objectives: To determine if CSF levels of the apoptotic markers
soluble Fas (sFas) and
soluble Fas ligand (sFasL) are elevated in HIV-associated dementia (HIV-D) and
if levels correlate with severity and course. Background: HIV-D develops in approximately 15% of AIDS
patients. The pathophysiology
includes intense CNS macrophage activation and astrocytic
and neuronal apoptosis. CSF sFas and sFasL are elevated in HIV-D, but these markers have not yet
been related to dementia course. Methods: CSF and serum sFas and sFasL were measured by ELISA (Oncogene)
in 16 patients with HIV-D and 30 HIV+ and 17 HIV- controls. Inflammatory and
infectious conditions were excluded. All HIV+ patients were HAART naïve. sFas and sFasL
levels were correlated with dementia severity and course (improvement,
progression, or stability) using Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) scores. The
median values for sFas and sFasL
were compared between groups using the Mann-Whitney nonparametric test. Results: HIV-D patients had higher CSF sFas
than HIV+ nondemented patients (p=0.020) and HIV- controls (p=0.004). Moderate
to severely demented patients (MSK 2-3) had higher CSF sFas (p=0.014) than
mildly demented patients (MSK 0.5-1). sFas
levels trended higher in serum and CSF in progressive HIV-D. Conclusion: The astrocyte
product sFas is elevated in CSF in HIV-D and correlates with dementia severity.
Levels are higher in progressive dementia, corroborating observations with
autopsy tissue. CSF sFas may be a useful marker for
assessing severity and prognosis of HIV-D.
Figure
1: Soluble Fas
in the cerebrospinal fluid was significantly higher in patients with HIV-D
compared with HIV seronegative controls and HIV seropositive, nondemented
controls.
Figure
2: Soluble Fas in the cerebrospinal fluid was
significantly higher in patients with moderate to severe dementia (MSK 2-3) compared with patients with mild dementia
(MSK 0.5-1). |
|
©2002 9th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections |