|
|
|
|
|
Session 27
Oral Abstract Presentations Antiretroviral Drug Resistance Session Day and Time: Thursday 10 - 11:45 am Presentation Time: 10:30 Room: Ballroom C |
Background: Hyper-susceptibility (HS) to HIV-1
Protease Inhibitors (PIs) has been reported by several groups. The clinical
significance of this phenomenon is unclear.
Methods: ESS40006 was designed to compare 2
regimens of Amprenavir (APV)/Ritonavir (RTV) (600/100 vs 900/100 twice daily)
in subjects failing their current ART regimen. NNRTI-naïve subjects were also
started on efavirenz, abacavir, and one additional NRTI, based on baseline
susceptibility (abacavir £ 5-fold-change from control, all others ≤ 4, PhenoSense). NNRTI-experienced
subjects received tenofovir in place of efavirenz. Multiple logistic regression
analysis was used to assess the effect of HS to APV and to identify predictors
of virologic response at week 24 (< 200 c/mL). Baseline (BL) APV-fold change
(FC) was used as a continuous variable and APV HS was defined as < 0.66 FC
based on sample distribution.
Results: Eighty-seven percent (87%; 27/31) of
NNRTI-naïve subjects achieved undetectable viral load (< 200 c/mL) by wk 24
(ITT Observed analysis), while 65% (39/60) of NNRTI-experienced subjects,
achieved < 200 c/mL (ITT Obs.). Modeling was not done for the EFV cohort
because only 4 of 31 subjects did not become undetectable by wk 24. For the TDF
cohort, HS to APV (Odds Ratio [OR]: 7.24, p = 0.015), APV FC (OR: 0.31, p =
0.018), and BL HIV-1 RNA (OR: 0.35, p = 0.022) each separately predicted
virologic response. The number of prior PIs used approached significance (p = 0.062).
When the significant covariates were studied in the same model using stepwise
selection, APV HS and BL HIV-1 RNA remained significant. Due to study design
there was little variability in susceptibility scores, however, genotypic
susceptibility scores (GSS, updated from IAS), phenotypic susceptibility scores
(PSS, using different clinical cut-offs), number of mutations (total or by
class), number of prior NRTIs, duration of prior ART, CDC classification,
baseline CD4 count and APV treatment group (600/100 or 900/100) were not
predictive of response.
Conclusions: APV/RTV-based therapy is effective in
subjects failing prior ART selected by baseline susceptibility. For NNRTI-
experienced subjects, HS to APV, lower APV FC, and a lower baseline viral load
were associated with an increased odds of achieving undetectability at 24 wks.