|
|
|
|
|
Session 35a
Oral Abstract Presentations Clinical Trials and Cohorts Session Day and Time: Friday 8:30 - 10:30 am Presentation Time: 09:15 Room: Auditorium |
Background: Tipranavir (TPV), the first non-peptidic protease
inhibitor (NPPI), has a uniquely robust resistance profile, demonstrating viral
load responses against multiple protease inhibitor (PI)-resistant HIV-1 both in
vitro and in clinical studies. Phase IIA studies have identified a range of
doses of tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r) which are expected to have efficacy and
tolerability in both single and multiple PI-experienced patients (pts). The
present study was designed to determine the optimal dose for use in Phase III
trials.
Methods: BI 1182.52 is a multicenter, international,
randomized, blinded trial of 3 doses of TPV/r (500 mg/100 mg; 500 mg/200 mg;
and 750 mg/200 mg). Entry criteria included experience of all 3 available
classes of antiretroviral, including at least 2 PIs and at least one primary PI
mutation. Any CD4+ cell count was allowed, and viral load > 1000
copies/mL. Background therapy was optimized after 2 weeks of functional
monotherapy with TPV/r. The primary endpoints were viral load reduction at 2 wks
and specific adverse events (AEs) at 4 wks.
Results: A total of 216 pts were randomized and evenly
distributed between arms with regard to baseline viral load, CD4+
cell count, demographics and prior treatment experience; 84.5% were male, 76.4%
were white, and 7.9% were HCV co-infected. Prior use of individual PIs ranged
from 37.5% for lopinavir to 79.6% for indinavir. The median baseline viral load
was 4.5 log copies/mL and CD4+ cell count was 153 cells/mm3.
After 2 wks, the median change in viral load was -0.9 log, -1.0 log, and -1.2
log in the 500/100, 500/200, and 750/200 arms, respectively (intent-to-treat;
last observation carried forward [ITT;LOCF]); these values did not show a
statistically significantly difference. Overall, 15.3% of pts experienced ≥ Grade 2 diarrhea and 11.6%
experienced vomiting; however, no clear dose response relationship was
observed. A dose-dependent trend was observed for Grade 3/4 AEs, laboratory
abnormalities, and AE related treatment discontinuations. Eleven (11) pts (5.1%)
experienced serious AEs of any causality during the first 4 wks, and 2/11 were
regarded as treatment related.
Conclusions: All 3 doses of TPV/r tested demonstrated potent
antiviral efficacy with an acceptable safety profile. The final dose to be
taken forward into Phase III trials will be determined and reviewed with
regulatory authorities.