E-mail Abstract Author Session Search Abstracts Program


Session 42 Poster Presentations
CD8 T-Cell Responses to HIV/SIV
Session Day and Time: Tuesday 1:30 - 3:30 pm
Room: Hall D


312
Induction of HIV-specific CD8+ T-cell Responses in Uninfected Individuals Following Mucosal and Parenteral Exposure to HIV
G. Makedonas*1, J. Bruneau2, M. Alary3, C.M. Tsoukas1, C. Lowndes4, F. Lamothe2, Y. Peretz1, N.F. Bernard1
1Immune Deficiency Treatment Ctr, McGill Univ Hlth Ctr Res Inst, Montreal, Canada; 2Res Inst of the Ctr Hosp de Univ de Montreal, Canada; 3Ctr Hosp de l’Univ de Quebec, Canada; and 4HIV and STI Div, PHLS Communicable Disease Surveillance Ctr, Imperial Coll, London, UK

Background: HIV-exposed, uninfected subjects (EUs) are more likely to exhibit HIV-specific immune responses than persons at low risk for HIV infection. Here we examine the effect of route of exposure on induction of virus specific immunity.

Methods: Group 1 (n = 21) included persons exposed to HIV via unprotected sex with HIV-infected partners; all denied intravenous HIV exposure. Of these 14 were men having sex with men (MSM) and 7 were heterosexual EUs in HIV discordant couples. The mucosally exposed population were further classified according to route of exposure (Table 1). Group 2 (n = 30) included subjects who admitted to sharing needles with HIV-infected partners and who denied HIV exposure via high-risk sexual contact. The IFN-γ ELIspot assay was used to detect HIV-specific effector activity to a panel of HLA restricted peptides.

Results: Responses to HIV in EUs is associated with HIV exposure (0/18 low risk controls versus 12/21 [57.1%] mucosally and 19/30 [63.3%] intravenously exposed subjects had HIV-specific responses [p < 0.01, c2-test for both comparisons]). A similar proportion of group 1 and 2 subjects exhibited virus specific responses (p = 0.66, c2-test). No between group differences were seen for the breadth and intensity of HIV-specific responses. Although we saw no statistically significant differences between the proportion of MSM and the heterosexual EUs having HIV-specific activity (p = 0.4, Fisher`s exact t-test) or the proportion of females exposed to HIV vaginally (2/3 [66.7%]) versus MSM exposed anally via receptive sex (3/8 [37.5%]) with HIV-specific responses (p = 0.5455, Fisher`s t-test), the small sample size of the comparison groups limits our ability to draw conclusions from these comparisons. More MSM than heterosexual men exposed to HIV via insertive intercourse exhibited HIV-specific ELIspot reactivity (p = 0.0333; Fisher`s exact t-test). This interesting observation warrants further exploration.

Conclusions: Both intravenous and mucosal exposure to HIV can induce HIV-specific immune responses in the absence of seroconversion. In EUs, vaginal and anal receptive and insertive sexual exposure to HIV can induce virus-specific immune responses not seen in low risk controls.

 

Table 1. HIV-specific reactivity among the mucosally exposed population

 MSM

9/14 (64.3%)

Heterosexuals

3/7 (42.9%)


Receptive and insertive


Insertive only

Vaginal receptive

(females)

Vaginal insertive

(males)

3/8 (37.5%)

6/6 (100%)

2/3 (66.7%)

1/4 (25%)