|
|
|
|
|
Session 63
Poster Presentations Relationships between Drug Levels and Their Effects Session Day and Time: Wednesday 1:30 - 3:30 pm Room: Hall A |
Background: Currently available approaches to measure adherence
have notable limitations. Several studies have employed random antiretroviral
drug levels as a candidate measure of adherence. We conducted a cross-sectional
study to test the hypothesis that random measurements of antiretroviral drug
levels correlate with level of adherence.
Methods: Antiretroviral
drug levels were compared with objectively measured adherence in a prospective
cohort of low-income HIV-positive adults (The REACH Cohort). Adherence was
measured by unannounced pill counts. Plasma specimens were drawn within 1 month
of the most recent adherence assessment. Unannounced pill counts are closely
associated with electronic medication monitors (r = 0.91, p < 0.00001, AIDS
Beh 2001), and with viral load (r = 0.67, p < 0.001 AIDS 2000) and do not
preclude the use of pill box organizers. Random drug levels for nelfinavir,
indinavir, efavirenz, and nevirapine were measured using HPLC MS-MS and
categorized a priori as abnormally low if below the published reference Cmin –
1 SD. The relationship between normal drug level and adherence above or below
the 90% adherence threshold was examined by the Fisher’s Exact test.
Results: Table 1 summarizes our results from 88 individuals.
Drug level was significantly associated with adherence dichotomized at 90% (p <
0.05). Except for indinavir, detectable drug level was 100% sensitive for
adherence ³ 90%. Specificity was
uniformly poor. Overall sensitivity was 91.7% (p < 0.05). Similarly, normal
concentrations of all drugs except indinavir had negative predictive values
(NPV) of 100% (abnormally low drug level predicting < 90% adherence), but
poor positive predictive values. Overall NPV was 82.4% (p < 0.05). Areas under
ROC curves ranged from 0.295–0.753.
Discussion:
We found that a single abnormally
low random drug level can predict adherence below 90%, but normal levels do not
reliably indicate adherence above this threshold. This relationship is strong
for all drugs studied except indinavir.
Table 1. Detectable drug level predicting adherence ³ 90%
|
|
n |
Sensitivity
|
Specificity |
NPV |
PPV |
AUC |
|
Indinavir |
17 |
57.1% |
20% |
40.0% |
33.3 |
0.686 |
|
Nelfinavir |
29 |
100.0 |
21.4 |
100.0 |
57.7 |
0.587 |
|
Efavirenz |
14 |
100.0 |
27.3 |
100.0 |
27.3 |
0.295 |
|
Nevirapine |
28 |
100.0 |
35.3 |
100.0 |
50.0 |
0.753 |
|
All
drugs |
88 |
91.7 |
26.9 |
82.4 |
46.5 |
0.546 |