|
|
|
|
|
Session 78
Poster Presentations Therapeutic Vaccination Session Day and Time: Wednesday 1:30 - 3:30 pm Room: Hall A |
Background: The dual activity of the regulatory Tat protein on
viral replication and immunosuppression strongly supports the use of Tat as a
key component of an anti HIV-1 vaccine candidate.
Methods: A double-blind,
randomized, placebo-controlled phase I/II study was conducted to evaluate the
safety and immunogenicity of an HIV-1 Tat toxoid vaccine with or without
adjuvant in P on stable Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) with VL
< 50 copies/mL and CD4 ³ 300/mm3.
P were randomized to receive 100 µg of Tat toxoid protein intramuscularly in
diluent (n = 12) or with DC-Chol adjuvant (n = 12) or DC-Chol adjuvant alone (n
= 8) at wk 0, 2, 4, 6, and 12. Local and systemic reactions were recorded.
Clinical and biological safety and/ or immunogenicity evaluations were recorded
at wk 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 16 and 24. Anti-native Tat Abs (IIIb) titers (ELISA), the
functionality of the Abs (transactivation assay) and the avidity of the
anti-Tat Abs (by Biacore) were measured. In
vivo DTH test was performed at the study end. Tat-specific proliferative
responses were measured (lymphoproliferation assay) as well as Tat specific CD4+
and CD8+ T-cell responses (ELISpot).
Results: Twenty-three
(23) patients (pts) experienced local reactions after any injections, in the 3
groups (5/12, 10/12, and 8/8), mostly pain (3, 10, and 8, respectively), of
which 1 severe on both Tat+DC-Chol and DC-Chol arm while systemic events
occurred in 7/12, 9/12, and 8/8, mostly asthenia, chills, fever, headache,
myalgia, sweating, none of severe entity. No lab abnormalities were observed,
nor any increase of VL. High anti-Abs Tat at wk 16 were detected in both groups
receiving Tat, (6/12 vs 12/12) higher in the Tat + DC-Chol group (p < 0,05).
No Ab response was noted in the placebo group. Transactivation neutralizing Abs
responses were detected in both groups receiving Tat (7/11 and 9/12). In
addition, Biacore analysis showed a strong avidity of the rTat induced Abs. Th2
CD4+ T-cell response was higher in the Tat + DChol group compared to
the Tat alone group (p < 0.05) as well as the Tat specific proliferative
response. Finally, the DTH test confirmed a cellular response in rTat vaccinees.
Conclusions: rTat toxoid vaccine administered with or
without DC-Chol appears safe and well tolerated. Immunization with rTat induced
specific neutralizing antibodies with high Tat avidity, significant
proliferative responses and a Th2-biased CD4+ T-cell profile.
DC-Chol showed an adjuvant effect on both humoral and cellular immunity
responses.