|
|
|
|
|
Session 98
Poster Presentations HIV-Associated Cytomegalovirus Infection: Immune Correlates and Drug Resistance Session Day and Time: Tuesday 1:30 - 3:30 pm Room: Hall B |
Background: The advent of
HAART has greatly reduced CMV disease incidence. While it has been proposed
that recovery of CMV-specific CD4+ T-cells is a critical mediator of
HAART’s protective effect, little is known about the determinants of
CMV-specific CD4+ T-cell recovery or the relationship between
CMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells during virologically
suppressive HAART.
Methods:
Homosexual
men treated with HAART with ≥ 3
months (mos) of plasma viral load (VL) < 1000 copies/ml were consecutively
sampled from the Study of the Consequences of the Protease Inhibitor Era
(SCOPE). The percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells that
were CMV-specific was determined by flow cytometric detection of CD69+
cells producing intracellular interferon-γ after stimulation with a
mixture of overlapping 15 amino acid peptides of CMV pp65. Overall
T-cell activation was defined by percentage
of CD8+ cells that were CD38+/HLA-DR+.
Results:
Among
74 subjects, the median duration of virologic suppression on HAART was 21 mos (range 3.1– 56); none had active
CMV disease. Median values were: age 43 yrs; nadir CD4 T-cell count 99 cells/mm3;
current CD4 count 442; pre-HAART VL 4.4 log10 copies/ml; and CD8+
activation 9.3%. All but 3 subjects had detectable CMV-specific CD4+
T-cells and all but 1 had detectable CMV-specific CD8+ cells. The
median percentage of CMV-specific cells was 0.12 (IQR 0.05–0.30) for CD4+
T-cells, which was lower than the median of 1.55 (IQR 0.72–3.24) for CD8+
cells (p < 0.001). The percentage of CMV-CD4+ T-cells was
directly related to percentage CMV-CD8+ cells (Spearman rho = 0.29,
p = 0.01). In a multivariable linear regression model, duration of suppression
(mean gain of 0.01 log10 percentage CMV-CD4+ cells per
month, p =0.03) and pre-HAART VL (mean of 0.22 fewer log10 percentage
CMV-CD4+ cells per log10 increase in VL, p = 0.003) were
independently associated with percentage CMV-CD4+ cells. There was
no evidence for an association with nadir CD4 count, current CD4 count or VL,
age, or overall T-cell activation.
Conclusion: Flow cytometric
techniques using pp65 peptide stimulation can be used to sensitively detect
CMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells in HLA-unselected
HIV-infected patients. Among patients with HAART-related virologic suppression,
the percentage CMV-CD4+ T-cells is related to CMV-CD8+
T-cells, increases with length of virologic suppression and is not influenced
by nadir CD4 count. Use of this assay may prove useful in determining a
threshold of protective levels of CMV-specific T-cells for management of
anti-CMV chemoprophylaxis.