|
|
|
|
|
Session 113
Poster Presentations Molecular Epidemiology Session Day and Time: Tuesday 1:30 - 3:30 pm Room: Hall B |
Background: Human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) group O (outlier) was first identified in
1990 as an HIV-1 strain highly divergent from group M (major). While the level
of genetic diversity within group O is similar to that between group M subtypes,
group O has not been classified into subtypes. A previous study, based on the
phylogenetic analyses of the gag p24,
pol p32, and env gp160 sequences from 39 group O isolates, laid the foundation
for the classification of group O subtypes. Five (5) phylogenetic clusters,
I-V, were identified that are congruent across all 3 genes, supported by
bootstrap values, and roughly equidistant from each other. The intra- and
intercluster genetic distances for group O are similar in magnitude to the
corresponding distances for group M subtypes. However, formal classification of
group O requires the availability of at least two full-length and one partial
genomes for each group O phylogenetic cluster.
Methods: In this study, 15
group O isolates were selected for full genome sequencing. The near full-length
genomic sequences were obtained by PCR amplification of four segments that link
the previously obtained gag, pol, and
env fragments and include the LTRs.
Results: Phylogenetic
analysis, using Phylip, of an alignment of these 15 sequences with 8 additional
group O genomes supports the classification of 3 group O subtypes (I-III) and
the potential existence of one circulating recombinant form (CRF) (IV) and at
least one additional subtype (V). Each of group O clusters I, II, and III, is
represented by 2 or more isolates with near full-length sequences and several
partial genomes from additional isolates; the clusters are equidistant from
each other and lack sub-segments of other clusters. Cluster IV is represented
by 2 full and 1 partial genomes and may represent a CRF of group O; cluster IV
is recombinant between cluster I and the parental strain of cluster IV. Cluster
V also meets the subtype criteria except that only 2 isolates have been
sequenced. Additional unclassified isolates suggest the existence of other
group O subtypes. Intra- and intercluster recombination was identified in 5 of
the 23 (22%) group O genomes.
Conclusions: Phylogenetic
analysis of 23 genomic sequences provides strong evidence for group O subtypes.
Formal classification of group O subtypes should be forthcoming pending the
analysis of additional group O genomes and agreement of the HIV nomenclature
committee.