|
|
|
|
|
Session 27
Oral Abstract Presentations Antiretroviral Drug Resistance Session Day and Time: Thursday 10 - 11:45 am Presentation Time: 10:15 Room: Ballroom C |
Background: TORO 1 and TORO 2
are randomized, open-label, controlled, multi‑center, Phase III
studies of patients (pts) receiving 90 mg BID of enfuvirtide (ENF, formerly
T-20) by subcutaneous injection in combination with an optimized background
(OB) regimen. Here we present for the first time resistance data determined
with a newly developed single cycle entry inhibitor assay.
Methods: The intent to
treat population included 661 pts randomized to ENF+OB. Resistance data were
generated using the novel GeneSeq and PhenoSense Entry Assays on Env amplified
from pt plasma samples to assess susceptibility to ENF (pEC50).
Combined data for TORO 1 and TORO 2 were analyzed using summary statistics.
Multiple linear regression analysis identified virological factors associated
with treatment-emergent (TE) change in pEC50 (DpEC50) and virological response.
Results:
ENF
pEC50 were available for viral Envs from 612 (92.6%) pts at baseline
(BL). By wk 24, 301 pts met protocol-defined virological failure and 204 of
these had genotype and phenotype available for paired BL and failure time
points. BL pEC50s were approximately log-normally distributed with a
geometric mean (GM) of 0.259 mg/mL (range 0.007–7.526
mg/mL) and a
standard deviation (SD) of approximately 2.7-fold. Sixteen (16) of 612 pts
(2.6%) had BL pEC50s greater than 1.956 µg/mL (GM + 2 SD), but did
not have a diminished virological response, nor were they predisposed to
virological failure (p = 0.7186 and p = 0.4579, respectively). Neither BL viral
tropism nor clade was associated with virological response. The GM pEC50
for pts at failure was 5.645 mg/mL and DpEC50 was 21-fold (range < 1–422-fold).
There was a correlation with decreased ENF susceptibility at virological
failure and changes in gp41 aa 36-45 (p < 0.0001). Varying DpEC50 were observed for distinct
TE substitutions in gp41 aa 36-45. Differences
in BL ENF GM EC50 between phase II and III studies may be explained
by differences in the assays employed.
Conclusions:
Using
GeneSeq and PhenoSense Entry Assays, we characterized susceptibility to ENF at
BL and at virological failure. Pts achieved similar virological suppression
across the range of BL ENF susceptibility observed. Pts taking ENF who met
virological failure criteria had on average a 21-fold loss of ENF
susceptibility, associated with concomitant changes in gp41 aa 36-45.