|
|
|
|
|
Session 53
Poster Presentations DNA Vaccines Session Day and Time: Thursday 1:30 - 3:30 pm Room: Hall D |
Background: Transmission
of HIV infection occurs predominantly via mucosal routes. The ability of vaccines to induce mucosal immunity
may be a necessary requirement for protection against HIV infection and AIDS.
Methods: We have investigated the immuno-stimulatory
properties of a DNA vaccine, which produces SHIV particles similar in protein
content to wild type virus, but non infectious because of 22 mutations in NC,
RT, and IN. To evaluate the induction of SHIV specific immunity, 5 groups of
Rhesus macaques were vaccinated either rectally (2 groups) or nasally (3
groups) with SHIV DNA at times 0, 2, and 6 months. Two (2) of 3 nasally
vaccinated groups also simultaneously received DNA expressing IL-2 or IL12
intranasally. Two (2) months after the last DNA immunization, one rectal group
and all 3 nasal groups also received rMVA expressing Gag, Pol, and Env. All
groups were evaluated for SHIV-specific immune responses throughout the
vaccination regimen.
Results: SHIV-specific IgA was detected
sporadically in secretions after vaccination with DNA alone. When viral DNA was
administered together with IL-2 or IL-12 DNA, SHIV-specific IgA was detected
earlier and more consistently. SHIV-specific IgG responses were present
systemically in some groups and boosted by mucosal administration of rMVA.
Cell-mediated immune responses were found both at mucosal and systemic sites. These
responses were most prevalent when animals were vaccinated intranasally or when
rectally vaccinated macaques were boosted with MVA. Furthermore, the nasal
route of vaccination stimulated surprisingly strong Env-specific, systemic
cellular responses, higher than the Gag responses detected in these animals.
which were comparable in magnitude to those observed by others using a
DNA-adenovirus vaccination regime. Following rectal challenge with cloned
SHIV89.6P, all animals became infected, but significant control of viremia was
observed in the animals in which systemic cellular responses were detected.
Conclusions: The data
indicate that mucosal administration of a DNA vaccine can significantly
stimulate both mucosal and systemic humoral and cell-mediated responses, in
particular when administered nasally. However, the efficacy of the mucosal
responses cannot be accurately evaluated in these animal trials because of the
extremely high titers of virus used for the challenge and may be better
evaluated after natural virus exposure where the virus inoculum is relatively
small.