|
|
|
|
|
Session 64
Poster Presentations Drug-Drug Interactions Session Day and Time: Wednesday 1:30 - 3:30 pm Room: Hall A |
Background: The HIV PIs
nelfinavir (NFV) and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) are substrates for and
inhibitors of CYP3A, as well as metabolic inducers. The purpose was to assess
the effects of co-administration of LPV/r and NFV on pharmacokinetic parameters
of LPV, ritonavir (RTV), NFV, and the hydroxy-t-butylamide metabolite of NFV
(M8).
Methods: This was a multiple-dose,
sequential, open-label, single-center, non-fasting, drug interaction study.
Fourteen (14) healthy subjects were enrolled and 13 subjects completed the
study; one subject prematurely discontinued for personal reasons. Each received
LPV/r 400/100 mg BID for 21 days. NFV, 1000 mg BID, was co-administered with
LPV/r starting with the evening dose of day 11 through the morning of day 21.
NFV, 1250 mg BID, was administered alone from the evening of day 21 to 35.
Plasma samples were collected pre-dose and up to 12 hrs after the morning dose
on days 11, 21, and 35. Concentrations of LPV, RTV, NFV, and M8 were determined
using LC/MS/MS and analyzed by noncompartmental methods. Parameter estimates
were compared by paired t-test.
Results: The effect of co-administration of
NFV with LPV/r can be seen below:
|
|
Ctrough (mg/mL)+ |
AUC12 (mg*h/mL)+ |
||||||
|
Regimen |
LPV |
RTV |
NFV |
M8 |
LPV |
RTV |
NFV |
M8 |
|
LPV/r or 1250 mg NFV alone |
7.1 |
0.2 |
1.1 |
0.2 |
95.9 |
5.3 |
24.2 |
6.4 |
|
LPV/r with 1000 mg NFV |
4.8* |
0.2 |
1.3 |
1.2* |
70.0* |
4.1* |
25.8 |
22.3* |
*p<0.05 compared to LPV/r or NFV alone
+ Geometric mean
LPV Cmax, AUC12 and Ctrough
were significantly decreased during NFV co-administration by 21, 27 and 33%,
respectively. LPV median (range) ratio of C0 to IC50 for wt-HIV
(IQ) was reduced from 105 (55 to 235) to 76 (30 to 136) during NFV; similar
decreases in RTV concentrations were noted. Co-administration with LPV/r
resulted in similar NFV IQ of 2.3 (0.7 to 7.3) alone and 2.2 (1.2 to 15.9)
during LPV/r and increased AUC of M8 by 3-fold despite a 20% reduction in the
NFV dose. Safety profiles were not altered with concomitant administration.
Conclusions: NFV decreases the
bioavailability of both LPV and RTV, while LPV/r increases dose-normalized
bioavailability of NFV and M8. The dose of LPV/r may need to be increased when
co-administered with nelfinavir, particularly in HIV patients with extensive
protease inhibitor experience or reduced viral susceptibility to LPV.
Concentrations of nelfinavir are similar when dosed at 1000 mg BID with LPV/r
compared to NFV 1250 mg BID alone.