E-mail Abstract Author Session Search Abstracts Program


Session 64 Poster Presentations
Drug-Drug Interactions
Session Day and Time: Wednesday 1:30 - 3:30 pm
Room: Hall A


537
Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Atazanavir/Ritonavir when Combined to Tenofovir in HIV Infected Patients with Multiple Treatment Failures: A Sub-study of Puzzle2-ANRS 107 Trial
A. M. Taburet*1, C. Piketty2, L. Gérard3, I. Vincent1, C. Chazallon3, F. Clavel4, V. Calvez5, J. P. Aboulker3, P.M Girard6
1Hosp Bicêtre, Paris, France; 2Hosp G Pompidou, Paris, France; 3INSERM, Villejuif, France; 4Hosp Bichat, Paris, France; 5Hosp Pitié Salpétrière, Paris, France; and 6Hosp St Antoine, Paris, France

Background: Combinations of new drugs could prove effective in pts patients (pts) who have failed multiple lines of antiretroviral therapy, provided that interactions do not alter pt exposure to the drugs. Tenofovir (TDF) and a Ritonavir (RTV) enhanced Atazanavir (ATV) regimen were combined as salvage therapy. The pharmacokinetic (pk) part of this study is described.

Methods: A prospective, randomized, open-label, multicentre trial in pts pts  with CD4+< 500/mm3 and plasma HIV RNAviral load  (pVL)> 10,000 copies/ml after failure of regimen lines containing at least 2 PIs and 1 NNRTIcontaining regimen. For the first 2 weeks (wks), pts pts  were randomized to unchanged PI and NRTIs (group 1) or to a combination of receive either once a day either: ATV (300 mg once a day), combined to RTV (100 mg once a day), andwith unchangedfailing NRTIs (group 12). , or failing PI and NRTIs maintained TDF 300 mg (group 2). From wksweeks 2­–26, all pts pts  received ATV/RTV, and TDF 300 mg (once a day) andco-administered with 2 - recycled nucleoside analogsNRTIs. Fifty-three (25 53) pts pts were enrolled in each treatment armrandomized in the study. Samples for ATV and RTV pk were drawn aton day 15  weewk 2 and wk on week 6 in 11 patients fromof  group 2.

Results: Ten (10) pts (x malesmale pts (meanmean 45 yearsear old) completed the pk study. At baseline, median CD4+ was 117/mm3 and median pVLHIV RNA was 5.1 log10 copies/ml. Average mMedian number of antiretrovirals taken prior to randomization was 11. ATV and RTV pk parameters (geometric means at weewk 2 and weewk 6 and their ratio and geometric mean (standard 90% CI) ratios (90% CI), median and range offor Tmax) were as follows:

 

ATV

 

RTV

 

wk 2

wk 6

wk 6/wk 2

wk 2

wk 6

wk 6/wk 2

Cmax (ng/ml)

4,422

3190

0.72 (0.50–1.05)

886

642

0.72 (0.43–1.21)

Tmax (h)

3 (25)

5 (15)

-

3 (28)

3 (0-5)

-

AUC24 (ng.h/ml)

46,073

34,459

0.75 (0.580.97)

7,011

5217

0.75 (0.441.24)

Cmin (ng/ml)

636

491

0.77 (0.541.10)

43

39

0.91 (0.731.13)

C24 (ng/ml)

696

513

0.74 (0.531.02)

 

50

44

0.88 (0.691.13)

 

Conclusions: At wk 2, ATV pk parameters when combined with RTV are in agreement with data obtained in healthy volunteers. After TDF introduction, both ATV and RTV parameters seemed to be reduced. These Ppreliminary findings suggest that decrease in the reduced ATV concentrations at wk 6 could be the result fromof loweredreduced RTV concentrations, even though the differences on most parameters did not reach statistical significance. The impact of TDF on ATV pk when given alone isare unknown. Mechanism of this non metabolic interaction, is unclear and could occur most likely to occur at the absorption level, needs further investigationsite.