|
|
|
|
|
Session 91
Poster Presentations Incidence, Prevalence, and Impact of Body Composition Abnormalities Session Day and Time: Thursday 1:30 - 3:30 pm Room: Hall B |
Background: Lipodystrophy, or more specifically, fat redistribution
(subcutaneous fat loss and/or visceral fat accumulation) is thought to be a
complication of the severity and duration of HIV infection and HAART,
associated with both nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and
protease inhibitors. In a previous analysis of this sub-study, the results
reflected loss of subcutaneous fat in all 3 regimens. This analysis assessed
the relative NRTI contribution on fat loss over a 2–3 yr period.
Methods: Non-randomized, cross-sectional, post-hoc sub-study of DMP
266-006 comparing 3 different regimens in therapy-naďve subjects: efavirenz
(EFV) + zidovudine (ZDV) + lamivudine (3TC), indinavir (IDV) + ZDV + 3TC, and
EFV + IDV. Consenting subjects underwent abdominal CT scans including a section
at the level of the umbilicus or fourth lumbar vertebra. CT scans were
performed locally at the next scheduled study visit with a follow-up scan 1 yr
later. An independent, central reader read all scans in a blinded fashion. We
compared changes in fat redistribution of patients receiving NRTIs versus an
NRTI-sparing regimen. Comparisons were made using the Wilcoxon test.
Results: A total 373 subjects enrolled in this sub-study.
Demographic and baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were comparable. The
median time across groups from study start to first scan was 738 days and to
the follow-up scan, 1,106 days; 277 subjects had both first and second scans. The
median changes in subcutaneous fat between the first and second scans can be
found in the chart below:
|
Subcutaneous Fat
Changes (median values in cm2) |
||||
|
|
|
|
Median Change |
p-value between arms |
|
NRTI-CONTAINING regimens ZDV + 3TC + IDV OR EFV n = 188 |
268.58 |
140.85 |
-108.98* |
> 0.05 |
|
NRTI-SPARING regimen EFV + IDV n = 89 |
331.07 |
185.25 |
-117.47* |
|
* Median change in subcutaneous fat between 1st
and 2nd scan (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: These data show that subcutaneous fat loss in patients
receiving NRTIs was not significantly different than those observed in the
NRTI-sparing arm, suggesting that NRTIs were not exclusively associated with
fat loss in this study.