E-mail Abstract Author Session Search Abstracts Program


Session 91 Poster Presentations
Incidence, Prevalence, and Impact of Body Composition Abnormalities
Session Day and Time: Thursday 1:30 - 3:30 pm
Room: Hall B


737
Impact on Fat Loss of ZDV + 3TC Backbone: Abdominal CT-scan Sub-study of Study DMP 266-006
K. Tashima*1, J. Morales-Ramirez2, D. Butcher3, C. Barros4, J. Maa5, L. Bessen6, E. Aznar5
1Miriam Hosp,Providence RI; 2San Juan, PR; 3Univ of Missouri-Kansas City Med Sch and the Kansas City AIDS Res Consortium; 4Hosp de Móstoles, Madrid, Spain; 5Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Plainsboro, NJ; and 6BMS, Lawrenceville, NJ

Background: Lipodystrophy, or more specifically, fat redistribution (subcutaneous fat loss and/or visceral fat accumulation) is thought to be a complication of the severity and duration of HIV infection and HAART, associated with both nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and protease inhibitors. In a previous analysis of this sub-study, the results reflected loss of subcutaneous fat in all 3 regimens. This analysis assessed the relative NRTI contribution on fat loss over a 2–3 yr period.

Methods: Non-randomized, cross-sectional, post-hoc sub-study of DMP 266-006 comparing 3 different regimens in therapy-naďve subjects: efavirenz (EFV) + zidovudine (ZDV) + lamivudine (3TC), indinavir (IDV) + ZDV + 3TC, and EFV + IDV. Consenting subjects underwent abdominal CT scans including a section at the level of the umbilicus or fourth lumbar vertebra. CT scans were performed locally at the next scheduled study visit with a follow-up scan 1 yr later. An independent, central reader read all scans in a blinded fashion. We compared changes in fat redistribution of patients receiving NRTIs versus an NRTI-sparing regimen. Comparisons were made using the Wilcoxon test.

Results: A total 373 subjects enrolled in this sub-study. Demographic and baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were comparable. The median time across groups from study start to first scan was 738 days and to the follow-up scan, 1,106 days; 277 subjects had both first and second scans. The median changes in subcutaneous fat between the first and second scans can be found in the chart below:

Subcutaneous Fat Changes (median values in cm2)

 


1st Scan


2nd Scan

Median Change

p-value

between arms

NRTI-CONTAINING regimens ZDV + 3TC + IDV OR EFV

n = 188

268.58

140.85

-108.98*

> 0.05

NRTI-SPARING regimen

EFV + IDV

n = 89

331.07

185.25

-117.47*

 

* Median change in subcutaneous fat between 1st and 2nd scan (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: These data show that subcutaneous fat loss in patients receiving NRTIs was not significantly different than those observed in the NRTI-sparing arm, suggesting that NRTIs were not exclusively associated with fat loss in this study.