|
|
|
|
|
Session 91
Poster Presentations Incidence, Prevalence, and Impact of Body Composition Abnormalities Session Day and Time: Thursday 1:30 - 3:30 pm Room: Hall B |
Background: HIV lipodystrophy (HIVLD) is a heterogeneous syndrome.
Both protease inhibitors (PIs) and nucleoside analogues (NRTIs) contribute to
pathogenesis. The contribution of non-nucleoside analogues (NNRTIs) to HIVLD
has not been demonstrated. In this study we assessed the effect on
lipodystrophy of ceasing combination NRTI therapy and switching to a ritonavir
boosted PI and NNRTI.
Methods: Assessment was by standardized questionnaire (maximally
thin -3 and maximally fat +3), physical examination, fasted laboratory
measurements, DEXA scan, and CT scan of mid-abdomen and thigh at weeks 0 and
48. Results were compared by Student’s t-test.
Results: The study enrolled 61 patients (38
male, 23 female). The median duration of prior NRTI therapy was 4.1 years. Strong
correlation between patient and physician based assessments was seen (all
correlation coefficients were statistically significant).
Conclusions: The results suggest that ceasing NRTIs and
switching to a PI and NNRTI regimen leads to an improvement of lipoatrophy.
This is consistent with the hypothesis that lipoatrophy is predominantly
mediated through NRTIs. In addition, the observed concomitant increases in
central abdominal fat support that PIs, through a separate mechanism, may lead
to lipoaccumulation.
|
|
Week 0 (n = 60) |
Week 48 (n = 60) |
|
|
|
Weight (kg) |
56.6 [9.7] |
56.5 [10.5] |
-0.1 [4.0] |
0.25 |
|
HIV RNA (c/ml) |
15,528 [13,918] |
1,564 [7,750] |
-13,964 [14,907] |
* |
|
CD4+ |
176 [126] |
297 [136] |
121 [108] |
* |
|
Lactate (mmol/L) |
1.41 [0.74] |
1.62 [0.64] |
0.20 [0.97] |
0.11 |
|
Total Cholesterol (mg/dl) |
172.2 [36.7] |
265.3 [74.6] |
93.2 [60.9] |
* |
|
Triglycerides (mg/dl) |
147.3 [83.6] |
383.8 [247.5] |
236.5 [212.7] |
* |
|
Glucose (mg/dl) |
91.8 [11.5] |
94.8 [12.0] |
3.1 [13] |
0.07 |
|
Body Composition,
sq. cm. (CT) |
||||
|
Mid-abdomen (visceral fat) |
86.3 [49.7] |
94.2 [54.3] |
8.0 [30.8] |
0.05 |
|
Mid-abdomen (subcutaneous fat) |
95.8 [51.0] |
104.5 [54.1] |
8.6 [31.7] |
0.04 |
|
Mid-thigh (subcutaneous fat) |
33.1 [23.9] |
36.6 [25.3] |
3.5 [7.6] |
* |
|
Body Fat as % of
Mass (DEXA) |
||||
|
Fat in trunk |
21 [7.0] |
22.8 [6.8] |
1.8 [3.6] |
* |
|
Fat in legs |
17.5 [9.8] |
19.2 [10.0] |
1.7 [2.5] |
* |
|
Fat in arms |
18.2 [8.9] |
21.0 [10.1] |
2.8 [3.8] |
* |
|
Body Lean as % of
Mass (DEXA) |
||||
|
Lean in trunk |
77.1 [6.9] |
75.4 [6.7] |
-1.7 [3.6] |
* |
|
Lean in legs |
78.4 [9.3] |
76.7 [9.6] |
-1.7 [3.6] |
* |
|
Lean in arms |
77.1 [8.6] |
73.8 [11.3] |
-3.4 [6.0] |
* |
|
Patient Assessment
of body – |
||||
|
Abdomen score (p-value) |
0.33 [1.34] (0.12) |
1.49 [1.60] (*) |
1.15 [1.72] |
* |
|
Thighs score (p-value) |
-0.68 [1.28] (*) |
-0.88 [1.32] (*) |
-0.20 [1.37] |
0.26 |
|
Arms score (p-value) |
-0.88 [1.33] (*) |
-1.07 [1.49] (*) |
-0.18 [1.53] |
0.36 |
* p < 0.001