E-mail Abstract Author Session Search Abstracts Program


Session 91 Poster Presentations
Incidence, Prevalence, and Impact of Body Composition Abnormalities
Session Day and Time: Thursday 1:30 - 3:30 pm
Room: Hall B


738
Lipodystrophy in Patients Switched to Indinavir/Ritonavir 800/100 mg BID and Efavirenz 600 mg QD after Failing Nucleoside Combination Therapy: A Prospective, 48-week Observational Sub-study of HIV-NAT 009
M. Boyd*1, D. Bien2, P. van Warmerdam 3, E. Hassink 3, P. Srasuebkul4, N. Chomchey4, T. Methanukroh4, B. Sopa4, S. Wangsuphachart5, A. Krisanachinda5, K. Ruxrungtham6, J. Lange3, D. Cooper1, P. Phanuphak6, P. Reiss7
1HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Res Collaboration, Thailand NCHECR, Univ of Sydney, Australia; 2Univ of Denver, CO; 3HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Res Collaboration, Thailand IATEC, Univ of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 4HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Res Collaboration, Thai Red Cross AIDS Res Ctr, Bangkok; 5Chulalongkorn Univ, Bangkok, Thailand; 6HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Res Collaboration, Thailand Chulalongkorn Univ; and 7Intl Antiviral Therapy Eval Ctr, Univ of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Background: HIV lipodystrophy (HIVLD) is a heterogeneous syndrome. Both protease inhibitors (PIs) and nucleoside analogues (NRTIs) contribute to pathogenesis. The contribution of non-nucleoside analogues (NNRTIs) to HIVLD has not been demonstrated. In this study we assessed the effect on lipodystrophy of ceasing combination NRTI therapy and switching to a ritonavir boosted PI and NNRTI.

Methods: Assessment was by standardized questionnaire (maximally thin -3 and maximally fat +3), physical examination, fasted laboratory measurements, DEXA scan, and CT scan of mid-abdomen and thigh at weeks 0 and 48. Results were compared by Student’s t-test.

Results: The study enrolled 61 patients (38 male, 23 female). The median duration of prior NRTI therapy was 4.1 years. Strong correlation between patient and physician based assessments was seen (all correlation coefficients were statistically significant).

Conclusions: The results suggest that ceasing NRTIs and switching to a PI and NNRTI regimen leads to an improvement of lipoatrophy. This is consistent with the hypothesis that lipoatrophy is predominantly mediated through NRTIs. In addition, the observed concomitant increases in central abdominal fat support that PIs, through a separate mechanism, may lead to lipoaccumulation.


Study Parameter, Mean (SD)

Week 0

(n = 60)

Week 48

(n = 60)


Change


p-value

Weight (kg)

56.6 [9.7]

56.5 [10.5]

-0.1 [4.0]

0.25

HIV RNA (c/ml)

15,528 [13,918]

1,564 [7,750]

-13,964 [14,907]

*

CD4+

176 [126]

297 [136]

121 [108]

*

Lactate (mmol/L)

1.41 [0.74]

1.62 [0.64]

0.20 [0.97]

0.11

Total Cholesterol (mg/dl)

172.2 [36.7]

265.3 [74.6]

93.2 [60.9]

*

Triglycerides (mg/dl)

147.3 [83.6]

383.8 [247.5]

236.5 [212.7]

*

Glucose (mg/dl)

91.8 [11.5]

94.8 [12.0]

3.1 [13]

0.07

Body Composition, sq. cm. (CT)

Mid-abdomen (visceral fat)

86.3 [49.7]

94.2 [54.3]

8.0 [30.8]

0.05

Mid-abdomen (subcutaneous fat)

95.8 [51.0]

104.5 [54.1]

8.6 [31.7]

0.04

Mid-thigh (subcutaneous fat)

33.1 [23.9]

36.6 [25.3]

3.5 [7.6]

*

Body Fat as % of Mass (DEXA)

Fat in trunk

21 [7.0]

22.8 [6.8]

1.8 [3.6]

*

Fat in legs

17.5 [9.8]

19.2 [10.0]

1.7 [2.5]

*

Fat in arms

18.2 [8.9]

21.0 [10.1]

2.8 [3.8]

*

Body Lean as % of Mass (DEXA)

Lean in trunk

77.1 [6.9]

75.4 [6.7]

-1.7 [3.6]

*

Lean in legs

78.4 [9.3]

76.7 [9.6]

-1.7 [3.6]

*

Lean in arms

77.1 [8.6]

73.8 [11.3]

-3.4 [6.0]

*

Patient Assessment of body –3 to +3

Abdomen score (p-value)

0.33 [1.34] (0.12)

1.49 [1.60] (*)

1.15 [1.72]

*

Thighs score (p-value)

-0.68 [1.28] (*)

-0.88 [1.32] (*)

-0.20 [1.37]

0.26

Arms score (p-value)

-0.88 [1.33] (*)

-1.07 [1.49] (*)

-0.18 [1.53]

0.36

* p < 0.001