|
|
|
|
|
Session 94
Poster Presentations Pathogenesis and Mechanisms of Lipodystrophy Syndromes Session Day and Time: Thursday 1:30 - 3:30 pm Room: Hall B |
Background: Published reports of the prevalence of asymptomatic
hyperlactatemia among HIV-infected individuals have ranged from 4%–36%. The
significance of these elevations in lactate in the absence of symptoms remains
uncertain. In addition, the variability in the reported AH prevalence may
reflect cohort differences in risk factors for hyperlactatemia and/or
techniques for venous lactate collection.
Methods: We examined the prevalence of elevated venous
lactate levels among HIV-infected, NRTI-treated subjects with one or more risk
factors associated with hyperlactatemia including previous hyperlactatemia;
anion gap > 15 mmol/L; HCO3 < 20 mmol/L; d4T use for > 6 months (mos);
recently elevated ALT, CK or LDH; mild-moderate nausea, fatigue, or abdominal
discomfort; peripheral neuropathy; lipoatrophy or osteopenia/porosis. Venous
lactate levels were collected in accordance with strict Adult AIDS Clinical
Trials Group guidelines without tourniquet or fist clenching. Hyperlactatemia
was defined as a level above 1.5x
the upper limit of normal (ULN). ULN at the study sites ranged from 2.2–2.4
mmol/L. Subjects with documented hyperlactatemia underwent repeat testing
within 2 wks.
Results:
Eighty-three
(83) subjects (14% women, 66% non-white)
were enrolled. At entry 75% were receiving d4T, 61% had
increased anion gap, 17% had ALT > ULN, 14% had self-described lipoatrophy, 11% had peripheral neuropathy, 6% had low HCO3, and 2% had
osteopenia. Mild abdominal discomfort was reported in 10% and nausea in 2%. All 83 subjects had multiple risk factors reported with 97% having > 4 risk
factors. The median initial venous lactate levels for the cohort was 1.2 mmol/L. An entry lactate level above the ULN was
detected in 6 subjects (range 1.04–2.1X ULN). The 1 subject with a level > 1.5X
ULN had a repeat lactate of 1.2X ULN when tested again within 14 days. No cases
of symptomatic hyperlactatemia or lactic acidosis were diagnosed.
Conclusions: Asymptomatic hyperlactatemia among subjects with
multiple risk factors previously associated with hyperlactatemia was not
observed when venous lactate levels were measured in a standardized fashion.
Our findings suggest that asymptomatic hyperlactatemia is either very rare or
an artifact of collection technique.