Session 26
Oral Abstracts
Retroviral Pathogenesis
Wednesday, 10 am - 12:30 pm
Presentation Time: 11:45 am
Room 2005
|
128
Frequent Simian Retrovirus Infection in Persons Occupationally Exposed to Nonhuman Primates
W M Switzer1, V Shanmugam1, V Bhullar1, J Yee2, N Lerche2, B Parekh1, M Cong1, R Boneva1, L E Chapman1, T M Folks1, and W Heneine*1
1CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA and 2Univ. of California, Davis, USA
Background: The recognition that AIDS
originated as a zoonosis heightens concerns associated with human infection
with simian retroviruses endemic in nonhuman primates, including simian
immunodeficiency virus (SIV), simian type D retrovirus (SRV),
simian T-cell lymphotropic virus (STLV), and simian foamy virus (SFV). Although
few simian retrovirus
infections in persons occupationally exposed to nonhuman primates have been reported, the
characteristics and significance of these zoonoses are not fully defined. We
report results from the surveillance of 4 simian retroviruses in persons working with nonhuman primates, and
characterize new zoonoses.
Methods: Consenting
participants from North
American institutions provided a serum sample for serologic testing for
SIV, SRV, STLV, and SFV.
Seropositive persons were interviewed regarding their exposure history, asked
about their current general health status, and asked to provide archived sera to
determine the duration of seropositivity. PCR
testing was performed on peripheral blood lymphocyte DNA
from seropositive persons. Phylogenetic analysis was done to determine the nonhuman primate
species origin of the infections. Samples from spouses of seropositive persons
were also tested by PCR and
serology.
Results: Testing of sera
from 418 participants from 15 research centers and zoos identified no STLV
infection. Sera from 2 persons with known SIV infection were positive for SIV.
Sera from 2 persons were positive for SRV
(0.48%) but PCR testing and virus
isolation were negative in both cases. Seroreversion was seen in one SRV-seropositive person. In contrast, sera from 14
persons (3.35%; 12 males, 2 females) were found to be SFV positive. SFV
integrase sequences were PCR-amplified
from the peripheral blood lymphocyte DNA
available from 13 cases. Phylogenetic analysis showed SFV infection originating
from African green monkeys (n = 1),
baboons (n = 4), and chimpanzees (n = 8). Archived sera, available from 12
cases, documented minimal SFV seropositivity of 0.5 to 26.0 years (median 15.5
years). All 13 cases report general good health. Wives of 6 SFV cases were
tested and remain uninfected; 11 SFV cases reported donating blood more than
once; 6 (54.5%) were seropositive at the time of donation.
Conclusions: Our study documents
persistent SFV infection originating from 3 nonhuman primate species in
occupationally exposed workers and shows that simian retroviruses cross into
humans more frequently than previously thought. These findings highlight the
importance of defining the public health significance of these zoonoses.
Keywords: zoonoses; simian; retroviruses
