Home Search Abstracts Browse Sessions Program Committee E-mail Abstract Author View Session


Session 32 Oral Abstracts
Clinical and Preclinical Vaccine Studies
Wednesday, 4 - 5:30 pm
Presentation Time: 5:00 pm
Room 2008


168
Evaluation of 2 Therapeutic HIV Vaccination Regimens in HAART-treated Primary HIV Infection Subjects following Analytical Treatment Interruption: QUEST PROB3005, a Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study
S Kinloch*1, L Perrin2, B Hoen3, F Lampe1, A Phillips1, L Goh4, C Tsoukas5, A Sonnerborg6, B Autran7, J Andersson6, R El Habib8, G Theofan9, N Carter4, D Cooper10, and the QUEST Study Group
1Royal Free and Univ. Coll. Med. Sch., London, UK; 2Geneva Univ. Hosp., Switzerland; 3Hosp. Saint-Jacques, Besancon, France; 4GlaxoSmithKline Res. and Devt., Greenford, UK; 5McGill Univ., Montreal, Canada; 6Karolinska Inst., Stockholm, Sweden; 7Hosp. Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; 8Aventis Pasteur, Lyon, France; 9Immune Response Corp., Carlsbad, CA, USA; and 10Univ. of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Background:  It has been hypothesized that therapeutic vaccination of HAART-treated primary HIV infection subjects could induce long-term suppression of plasma HIV-1 RNA (pVL) following HAART discontinuation. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to assess the effect of therapeutic HIV vaccination on pVL following analytical treatment interruption in primary HIV infection.

Method:  We randomized 79 adult subjects from 25 centers (Europe, Australia, and Canada) on long-term (1.5 to 5 years) suppressive HAART (pVL<50 copies(c)/mL) since primary HIV infection, to receive over 24 weeks either  placebo (P),  ALVAC-HIV (vCP1452), or ALVAC-HIV (vCP1452) + Remune, followed by discontinuation of HAART.  The primary efficacy end-point (ITT restart treatment or missing = failure) was the difference (P versus pooled vaccines arms) in proportions of subjects with pVL <=1000 copies/mL at 24 weeks following HAART discontinuation (PT24).

Results:  Pre-vaccination demographic characteristics were similar between treatment arms (median CD4 count: 750 cells/mm3, median HAART duration: 576 days). All subjects completed the vaccination schedule and initiated the analytical treatment interruption, although 7 subjects restarted HAART before the PT24 primary endpoint and were considered failures.  Overall, 15/79 (19%) of subjects had viral load ul<1000 c/mL at PT24, (22% placebo vs 17% pooled vaccines), showing no statistically significant difference between the placebo and pooled vaccine groups (treatment difference: -5.3%, 95CI:  -24.3% - 13.8%).  The treatment difference was broadly similar for the other PT24 pVL cut-offs of ul< 5,000 (37% placebo vs 37% pooled vaccines), <=10,000 (48% placebo vs 44% pooled vaccines), ul< 50,000 (70% plavebo vs 71%  pooled vaccines), and ul< 100,000 copies/mL (74% placebo vs 75% pooled vaccines).  Median CD4+ cell change from randomisation was -98 cells/mm3 and was similar across the 3 treatment groups.  No subjects exhibited disease progression.  Adverse events were similar among the groups with no reported serious treatment-related adverse events and no subjects discontinued the vaccination phase because of adverse events.

Conclusions:  This first randomized, double-blind study of therapeutic HIV vaccination in HAART-treated primary HIV infection subjects did not demonstrate a significant benefit of vaccination over placebo in terms of pVL control after HAART discontinuation.  Further analyses will determine if the vaccine regimens resulted in significant HIV-1 specific cellular immune responses.  High compliance (100%) and low rate of adverse events suggest that these vaccine regimens were well tolerated.

Keywords: Therapeutic vaccination; Primary HIV infection; Analytical treatment interruption