Home Search Abstracts Browse Sessions Program Committee E-mail Abstract Author View Session


Session 80 Poster Abstracts
Antiretroviral Therapy: Predictors of Response and Virologic Failure
Monday, 1:30 - 3:30 pm
Poster Hall


554
Time to Triple Drug Class Failure after Initiation of HAART
A Mocroft*1, B Ledergerber2, J P Viard3, S Staszewski4, M Murphy5, A Chiesi6, A Horban7, A B Hansen8, A N Phillips1, J D Lundgren9, and the EuroSIDA study group
1Royal Free and Univ. Coll. Med. Sch., London, UK; 2Univ. Hosp. Zurich, Switzerland; 3Hosp. Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France; 4JW Goethe Univ. Hosp., Frankfurt, Germany; 5St. Bartholemews Hosp., London, UK; 6Inst. Superiore di Sanita, Rome, Italy; 7Ctr. Diagnostyki i Terapii AIDS, Warsaw, Poland; 8Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; and 9Hvidovre Hosp., Copenhagen, Denmark

Background: After exposure to the three main classes of antiretrovirals treatment options in patients with HIV may be limited due to difficulties in maintaining undetectable levels of viraemia, decreasing CD4 counts and clinical disease progression.  We sought to describe the incidence of and time to virologic triple drug class failure (failure) and the factors related to it after starting HAART.

Methods: 3538 patients from the pan-European observational study, EuroSIDA, were followed from the date of starting HAART (baseline) until failure.  Rates of failure were described using incidence rates.  Cox proportional hazards models were used to describe factors related to failure in both treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients.

Results: A total of 469 patients (13.3%) failed 3 drug classes; of these, 400/2430 (16.5%) were treatment-experienced and 69/1108 (6.2%) were treatment-naïve.  At 6 years after baseline, 24.1% of treatment-experienced patients were estimated to have failed (95%CI: 21.6 to 26.6) compared to 11.9% of treatment-naïve patients (95%CI:  8.6 to 15.2) while the prevalence of failure among patients under follow-up at/after 2002 was 16.1% in treatment-experienced patients and 5.5% in treatment-naïve.    Among treatment-naïve patients, there was an increase in the incidence of failure with increasing time from baseline from 1.2 per 100 person-years follow-up (95%CI:  0.7 to 1.7) in the first 2 years to 4.7 per 100 person-years follow-up (95%CI:  2.1 to 8.9) at or after 5 years from baseline (33% per year increase (95%CI:  12 to 58%, p = 0.030), similar to the rate seen in treatment-experienced patients treated for the same period of time (5.4 per 100 person-years follow-up, 95%CI: 3.5 to 7.3).  Patients who were treatment-naïve with higher CD4 count and lower viral load at baseline were at a decreased risk of failure, but there was no clear cut-off value at which the risk started to increase.   In addition, treatment-experienced patients who also started 2 new nucleosides at baseline had almost a 50% reduced risk of failure (95%CI:  0.34 to 0.77,  p = 0.0012), while each additional 12 months exposure to nucleosides before baseline was associated with a 6% increased risk of failure (95%CI:  2 to 11%, p = 0.0016).

Conclusions:  We found a low rate of triple drug class failure among patients starting HAART, particularly among treatment-naïve patients; this rate increased with time from starting HAART in treatment-naïve patients.  Low CD4 counts and high viral loads at baseline were associated with an increased risk of triple drug class failure in treatment-naïve patients.  The longer term consequences of triple class virologic failure on the durability of HAART and how best to manage this situation deserves further focus.

Keywords: triple-drug class failure; treatment naive; treatment experienced