| Home | Search Abstracts | Browse Sessions | Program Committee | E-mail Abstract Author | View Session |
|
|
|
Session 86
Poster Abstracts Pharmacology of Protease Inhibitors Tuesday, 1:30 - 3:30 pm Poster Hall |
Background: The MaxCmin1 trial was a phase 4 randomized, open-label, multicenter trial
to evaluate the safety and efficacy of indinavir/ritonavir (IDV/RTV; 800/100 mg
twice daily) vs saquinavir/ritonavir (SQV/RTV; 1000/100 mg twice daily) in
adult HIV-1-infected patients. Comparable antiretroviral efficacy was observed
between both arms although a greater number of treatment-limiting adverse
events were observed in the Idv/Rtv
arm, relative to the Sqv/Rtv arm.
In order to investigate whether genetic variation within the MDR1 gene (coding
for P-glycoprotein) contributed to treatment endpoints and variability in
pharmacokinetics, we genotyped patients for the common single-nucleotide
polymorphisms C3435T and G2677T.
Methods: Of the 306 patients who initiated treatment, 229 patients were
genotyped for either C3435T or G2677T or both. Additional blood samples were
obtained for analysis of drug concentrations. Genomic DNA was extracted from
cell suspensions using the Qiagen genomic DNA isolation kit. Both C3435T and
G2677T single-nucleotide polymorphisms were genotyped by taqman allelic
discrimination protocol following amplification with specific primers and
fluorescent probes. Statistical analyses were then performed using individual
single-nucleotide polymorphisms and the haplotypes generated from the two using
STATA software (version 7). Logistic regression models were constructed in
order to determine whether either genotype or haplotypes were predictors of a
viral load>50/400 copies/mL or the time to a CD4 rise of >100 cells/mL from baseline. Similar analyses were
carried out to determine whether clinical progression or time to an adverse
event were dependent on these single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Finally,
regression models were constructed in order to determine whether predicted
trough concentrations of SQV, IDV and RTV were dependent on MDR1 genetics.
Results: No significant differences were observed in any of the regression models for change in CD4 count or VL relative to C3435T, G2677T or haplotype in pooled analyses. No differences were observed in drug levels at week 4 (table) or 48 for MDR1 haplotypes. or individual genotypes.
|
|
n |
Haplogype |
Mean Ctrough(ng/mL) (95%CI) |
p |
|
Saquinavir |
47 |
MDR1*1 |
770.3
(517.4 - 1137.1) |
0.93 |
|
|
|
MDR1*1/*2 |
711.9
(478.1 - 1060.0) |
|
|
|
|
MDR1*2 |
689.3
(437.2 - 1086.8) |
|
|
Indinavir |
58 |
MDR1*1 |
1386.7
(886.4 - 2169.3) |
0.59 |
|
|
|
MDR1*1/*2 |
1021.0
(638.5 - 1632.4) |
|
|
|
|
MDR1*2 |
1368.2
(809.6 - 2312.3) |
|
|
Ritonavir |
108 |
MDR1*1 |
517.9
(408.8 - 656.2) |
0.49 |
|
|
|
MDR1*1/*2 |
430.3
(337.6 - 548.5) |
|
|
|
|
MDR1*2 |
436.7
(332.3 – 573.9) |
|
Conclusions: Genetic analysis of the MDR1 gene failed to correlate with predicted trough concentrations of SQV, IDV, and RTV in this study. However, his work does not exclude a clinically significant role for P-gp, or a role for other host single-nucleotide polymorphisms in MDR1 and other transporter loci, in influencing clinical progression in response to protease inhibitors.
Keywords: P-glycoprotein; Protease Inhibitors; Genotype
