539 
A Prospective Study of Post-exposure Prophylaxis following Sexual Assault in South Africa
Michelle Roland*1, L Myers2, R Chuunga2, L Martin2, A Maw2, T Coates3, and L Denny2
1Univ of California, San Francisco, USA; 2Univ of Cape Town, South Africa; and 3Univ of California, Los Angeles, USA
Background: Post-exposure
prophylaxis (PEP) is offered
following sexual assault (SA) in South Africa, but adherence and
side effects have not been described in this setting.
Methods: An observational cohort of subjects
enrolled within 2 weeks of a SA involving potential HIV transmission. Those
presenting within 72 hours are offered PEP.
Adherence is assessed at 1 and 4 weeks. Subjects are followed for 6 months for
symptoms, potential interim HIV exposure, and HIV seroconversion.
Results: We enrolled 116 eligible subjects from
March 2004 to September 2004; 113 were women. The median age is 20.5 (14 to 67)
years. Eighty-four (72%) were African and 30 (26%) were “colored.” Vaginal
penetration was reported by 95 (82%), anal penetration by 6 (5%), and vaginal penetration
plus other exposure(s) by 15 (13%). Twenty-seven (23%) were assaulted by more
than 1 perpetrator, and 11 (9%) subjects reported previous sex with the
perpetrator for a median of 1.4 years (1 day to 8 years). Of the group, 114
(98%) of the subjects were eligible for, and105 (92%) received, PEP. Median time from the assault to PEP initiation was 24 hours (4 hours to 5 days). PEP was initiated within 24 hours by 42 (40%); 25
to 48 hours by 50 (48%); 49 to 72 hours by12 (11%), and after 72 hours by 1.
Five subjects discontinued PEP
prior to 28 days, and 23 (26%) of 87 subjects taking PEP
at week 1 reported missing any doses in the prior 4 days. Of 49 subjects taking
PEP at week 4, 3 (6%) reported
missing any doses in the prior 4 days. Fift-nine
(51%) of 116 subjects reported a ± grade 2 symptom at their initial visit. At
week 1, 35 (36%) of 96 subjects reported a ± grade 2 symptom at week 1; 26
(32%) of 81 reported a ± grade 2 symptom at week 4. Unprotected intercourse
since the last visit was reported by 42 (44%) at week 1, 20 (25%) at week 4,
and (33%) at week 12. There was 1 HIV seroconversion at week 12 in a subject
who reported excellent adherence and whose regular sexual partner’s HIV status
is unknown.
Conclusions: SA
in this setting involves high-risk exposures and often multiple perpetrators. PEP is often available within 48 hours and is
well-accepted. Few discontinue PEP,
but a quarter report missed doses in the first week. Symptoms are common,
although without a placebo or no-treatment control we cannot attribute them to PEP as opposed to trauma-associated distress. More
intensive counseling and/or a shorter course regimen with few side effects may
improve adherence. Counseling to minimize subsequent HIV exposure in this high-HIV
prevalence context is critical.
Keywords: Post-exposure prophylaxis; Prevention; Sexual Assault