|
|
|
|
|
Session 145
Poster Abstracts Abacavir Hypersensitivity and Injection Site Reactions Wednesday, 1:30 - 3:30 pm Hall B |
Background: The
hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) to abacavir (ABC) is
a clinical syndrome with multi-organ/system involvement, seen in about 5% of
subjects receiving ABC. Rash is part of the syndrome in about 70% of suspected
cases. We did an updated analysis of 37 trials using ABC once or twice daily to
identify clinical and other potential determinants of the development of
suspected HSR to ABC, and further analyzed a subset of 12 ABC clinical trials to
characterize ABC-associated rash within and outside HSR.
Methods: All GSK trials
with ³ 24 weeks of ABC use and
authorized databases by January 2004 were analyzed. Cases had a clinical
syndrome compatible with HSR or HSR collection modules in the case report form
(CRF). Variables analyzed for association with suspected HSR included baseline
demographic data, CDC HIV-1 class, CD4+ cells, plasma HIV-1 RNA,
prior therapy, ABC dosing, concurrent medications, and clinical lab results.
After univariate analyses, 2 multivariable models
with stepwise selection were constructed with and without baseline lab data.
Variables with significance < 0.05 were retained in these models. Rash was
further characterized in all trials using the HSR CRF module.
Results: Among the 37
protocols, the rate of HSR ranged from 0% to 14%. Data from 9329 subjects were
analyzed; 501 (5.4%) reported HSR to ABC. Of the variables, 12 yielded p < 0.10 in univariate
models. In the multivariable analysis, African ethnicity (OR 0.56), male gender
(OR 0.69), baseline CDC class C (OR 0.73), and use of the HSR CRF module (OR
2.08) remained significant. Frequency of ABC dosing did not correlate with risk
for reporting HSR to ABC. While 3962 subjects used the HSR CRF module, 653
reported rash with no HSR. Of 304 cases of HSR; 200 (66%) included rash as part
of the syndrome. Baseline demographics and characteristics were comparable
between patients with and without rash, and between patients with rash with and
without a diagnosis of HSR. Most rashes in both groups were mild to moderate.
Median time to onset for rashes reported without HSR was 18 days, longer than
the median time to onset of HSR-associated rash (11 days). Few subjects (34 of 653,
5%) discontinued ABC following rash without HSR. All subjects discontinued ABC after
suspected HSR.
Conclusions: African
ethnicity, male gender, and baseline CDC class C were associated with a reduced
risk of HSR, while ABC dosing frequency was not. Use of the HSR CRF module was
associated with higher odds of reporting HSR. Minor differences were seen
between the rash associated with ABC HSR and the rash reported outside HSR. The
presence of rash is insufficient to make a diagnosis of HSR, since 95% of
subjects that developed rash without HSR continued ABC. However, when ABC-related
HSR cannot be ruled out, ABC should be discontinued.
Keywords: Abacavir; Hypersensitivity; Cutaneous reactions
![]() |