|
|
|
|
|
Session 50
Poster Abstracts Viral Replication: Early Events, Fusion, and Tropism Wednesday, 1:30 - 3:30 pm Hall D |
Background: The use of both CCR5 and CXCR4 as co-receptors
during host cell entry in HIV-1 subtypes A, B, and D is well known. In these
subtypes, there is a strong association between CXCR4 usage and accelerated disease
progression. However, subtype C, responsible for 42% of global infections,
rarely uses CXCR4. The ability to screen large C-infected cohorts for X4
viruses, and relate their presence to disease status, is vital to understanding
this important difference. However, in
vitro determination of co-receptor usage is not always feasible, especially
in those developing countries where C predominates. A reliable phenotype
prediction method, based on sequence, could provide for rapid and less
expensive screening. Existing methods using B V3 loop data do not perform well
when applied to other subtypes. We hypothesized that we could develop a
reliable C-specific phenotype predictor using V3 sequences of C isolates of
known phenotype.
Methods: We derived predictors from position-specific
scoring matrices (PSSM) based on a subtype C training set of 229 R5 V3
sequences (from 200 subjects) and 51 X4 V3 sequences (20 subjects). Specificity
and sensitivity distributions were estimated by combining dataset bootstrapping
with leave-one-out cross-validation. Non-independence of sequences was
attenuated by randomly sampling single sequences from individuals on each bootstrap iteration. We also performed V3-based heteroduplex tracking assays (V3-HTA) using a known R5 as
probe and a subset (n = 21) of the
training set as targets. We compared mobilities to
PSSM scores using linear regression.
Results: The C-specific predictor (C-PSSM) had
specificity 91% [95% CI 89% to 93%] and sensitivity 84% [CI 79% to 89%], based
on leave-one-out bootstrap using all sequences. Analysis based on single
sequences per individual gave comparable specificity (94% [92% to 96%]) and
somewhat lower sensitivity (75% [68% to 82%]). These are similar to B-PSSM
results (median specificity 93%; sensitivity 88%). The C-PSSM is significantly
more sensitive than the B-PSSM applied to the C sequences (sensitivity 37%).
V3-HTA mobilities correlated with C-PSSM score (p < 0.0001; r2: 0.56).
Conclusions:
We derived a C-specific phenotype
predictor that performs nearly as well on C V3 loops as do existing B-specific
methods on B V3 loops, and can thus be applied to characterize C V3 sequence of
unknown co-receptor use. V3-HTA could provide an inexpensive method for scoring
large numbers of subtype C V3 samples.
Keywords: Coreceptor usage; Subtype C; PSSM
![]() |