 |
891 
Efavirenz Levels and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with TB and HIV Treated Concomitantly with ART and Rifampin-containing TB Regimen
Gerald Friedland*1,2, C Jack2, S Khoo3, U Lalloo2, and V Naidoo2
1Yale Univ, New Haven, CT, USA; 2Nelson R Mandela Sch of Med, Univ KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa; and 3Univ of Liverpool, UK
|
Background: Integration of
tuberculosis (TB) and antiretroviral therapies (ART) could improve the outcome
of both diseases. Phamacokinetic interactions between
rifampin (RIF) and ART, proper dose, and
clinical consequences must be defined. We monitored efavirenz
(EFV) levels during and after TB therapy and correlated results with clinical
outcomes in a pilot study of integrating TB therapy and ART in Durban, South
Africa.
Methods: Consenting
patients with smear+ pulmonary TB and HIV+ received once-daily
didanosine (ddI)+lamivudine (3TC)+EFV (600 mg),
with RIF-containing TB regimen by directly observed therapy (DOT). and
self-administration at TB therapy completion. Trough EFV levels were measured
by HPLC at baseline and 1, 2, 4, and 6 months on RIF and 15 months after RIF was
discontinued (therapeutic range 1000to 4000 ng/mL).
Results: Of 20 patients
enrolled, 17 completed combined RIF+EFV therapy (15 female, mean age 31 years, baseline weight 59.4 kg [range 45 97],
viral load 5.75 log10 CD4 230 cells/mm3), 16 (80%) achieved an undetectable viral load, CD4 cell count increase 148 cells/mm3, and
weight increase of 3.7 kg; 19 (95%) were cured of TB. Three patients remained
viremic, 2 with 3TC- and EFV-resistance and 7 (35%) had neuropsychiatric
symptoms. After a mean of 15 months of self-administration, 82% remained on ART, 65% had an undetectable viral load and a
total mean weight gain of 7.4 kg. All EFV levels (n = 71) median 1339 ng/mL (range 354 to 27,179), on RIF (n = 58) median 1401 ng/mL (range), off RIF (n =
13) median 1479 ng/mL (range 572 to 3975) (p = ns). There
was substantial intersubject variation, but intrasubject
levels were consistent over time. Four patients had
repeatedly high EFV levels on RIF (3 normalized off RIF); 6 repeatedly low
levels (4 normalized off RIF); 6 low normal levels (4 normalized off RIF). EFV levels were associated with weight: < 60 kg (n = 31) median 2101 ng/mL (range 354 to 27,179), > 60 kg (n = 34) median
1401 ng/mL (445 to 10,311) (p < 0.05) < 60 kg, 26% > 4000 ng/mL,
> 60 kg 12% > 4000 ng/mL (p < 0.05), but not with a percentage < 1000 ng/mL; gender; ART efficacy; failure; ART resistance or
toxicities (although both patients with levels >10,000 ng/mL
had neuropsychiatric toxicity).
Conclusions: Treatment
for TB and HIV with RIF and EFV 600 mg/day, was efficacious as measured by viral load, CD4 and weight
gain. EFV levels were significantly
affected by weight and influenced by RIF, but
did not predict either clinical efficacy or toxicity. The wide variability in
EFV concentrations suggests that 600 mg/day is adequate in this population,
except in patients who weigh > 60 kg, in whom increasing the dose should be
considered.
Keywords: Tuberculosis; Antiretrovirals; efavirenz/rifampin
|