94LB
Delay of HIV-1 Rebound after Cessation of ART through Passive Administration of Human Neutralizing Antibodies
Alexandra Trkola*1, H Kuster1, P Rusert1, B Joos1, M Fischer1, C Leemann1, A Manrique1, M Huber1, A Oxenius2, R Weber1, G Stiegler3, B Vcelar3, H Katinger3, L Aceto1, and H Günthard1
1Zurich Univ Hosp, Switzerland; 2ETH Zurich, Switzerland; and 3Polymun Scientific, Vienna, Austria
Background: To determine the protective potential of the
humoral immune response against HIV-1 in vivo we evaluated the potency of 3 neutralizing antibodies (2G12, 2F5, and
4E10) in suppressing viral rebound in 6 acutely and 8 chronically HIV-1-infected
patients undergoing interruption ART.
Methods: Starting 1 day before ART
was stopped, patients received 13 passive immunizations with the 3 monoclonal
antibodies over an 11-week period and were further followed until week 24 and
closely monitored immunologically and virologically. Patients were selected according to the
sensitivity of pre-treatment viral isolates to the 3 monoclonal antibodies.
Results: Three
chronically infected patients either totally suppressed viremia during the
passive immunization or had a significantly delayed or lower rebound compared
to previous treatment interruptions. Rebound in acutely infected
individuals was compared to a control group of 12 patients with acute infection
undergoing interruption of ART.
Upon cessation of ART, antibody-treated,
acutely infected individuals rebounded significantly later than patients of the
control group (Kaplan–Meyer p =
0.0286; Fisher’s exact p = 0.0128).
Four patients showed extended control at lower viral loads than before ART. Sequential viral isolates derived under
antibody treatment showed no relevant changes in the sensitivity to monoclonal antibodies
2F5 and 4E10, nor were sequence changes in the epitopes of these antibodies
apparent. In contrast, we observed a pronounced resistance of the rebounding
virus to monoclonal
antibody 2G12 in 11 of the 13
patients that carried initially 2G12-sensitive virus. Moreover, ratios of plasma concentrations to
in vitro inhibitory doses for 2G12 were much higher in responding than in non-responding
patients (p = 0.0175) suggesting
an influence of 2G12 dosage and activity
on the outcome of the trial.
Conclusions: Of 14 patients, 7 responded to the antibody
treatment with a clearly delayed or decreased rebound thus providing the first
direct evidence that neutralizing antibodies can in principle contain viremia
in human HIV-1 infection. By giving first insight on the potency, breadth, and
titers of neutralizing antibodies required for in vivo activity, our data underline both the potential as also the
limits of HIV-1 vaccines based on humoral immunity.
Keywords: neutralizing antibodies; passive immunization; vaccine