Home Search Abstracts Browse Sessions Program Committee View Session E-mail Abstract Author

 

 




Session 22 Oral Abstracts
Clinical Pharmacology: New Agents, Interactions, and Predictors of Virologic Response
Thursday, 10 am - 12:30 pm
Presentation Time: 11:15 am
Ballroom A


82
An Open-label, Non-randomized Study of the Effect of Depo-medroxyprogesterone Acetate on the Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Selected Protease Inhibitors and Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors Therapies among HIV-infected Women
Susan Ellen Cohn*1, D Watts2, J Lertora3, J G Park4, S Yu4, and the A5093 Team
1Univ of Rochester Med Ctr, NY, USA; 2NICHD, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA; 3Tulane Univ, New Orleans, LA, USA; and 4Harvard Sch of Publ Hlth, Boston, MA, USA

Background:  Few data are available on the interaction of progesterone-based contraceptives and ART, especially protease inhibitors (PI) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI). Millions of women worldwide use DMPA (Depo-provera®) and interactions with ART could lead to changes in efficacy or toxicity of either drug.

Methods:  We prospectively determined the effect of DMPA on the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir (NFV), efavirenz (EFV), and nevirapine (NVP) comparing ART AUC (0 to 12 h) at baseline and after 4 weeks of DMPA among HIV-infected subjects (Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Safety and toxicity of DMPA and ovulation suppression (using progesterone levels of < 5ng/mL by HPLC) were assessed during the 12-week study with subjects on the PI and NNRTI regimens compared to those on NRTI only or no ART (see the table below). Subjects had not received DMPA within 180 days, any other hormones within 30 days, and had not taken both PI and NNRTI with their NRTI.

Results:  We enrolled 65 evaluable women who were taking NFV (n = 20), EFV (n = 15), and NVP (n = 14), or NRTI only or no ART (n = 16). At entry, 55% of subjects were black, 21% Hispanic, and 18% white; median age 35; 24% had ever used injection drugs; median CD4 703 and median log10 HIV RNA 2.17, with 26% having HIV RNA < 50 copies; median weight was 156 lb; all had negative pregnancy tests. No women appeared to ovulate during the study and there were no pregnancies. DMPA was well tolerated with no grade 3 or 4 treatment related toxicities. Possibly treatment related grade 1 or 2 toxicities occurred in 17 (26%) of 65 subjects; of the 32 toxicities, the most frequent were:  menstrual changes (8), abdominal pain/cramping (3), and headache (3).

 

Regimen

 

n

Mean loge AUC 0-12h (ng×h/mL)

p value

Without DMPA (Week 0)

With DMPA (Week 4)

NVP + NRTI

13

10.98

11.14

0.048

EFV + NRTI

14

3.56

3.50

NS

NFV + NRTI

20

10.49

10.29

NS

M8* + NRTI

20

8.78

8.84

NS

* Active metabolite of NFV

 

Conclusions:  Efficacy of DMPA among HIV+ women does not appear to be altered in the presence of NFV-, EFV-, and NVP-based regimens, with no evidence of ovulation occurring based on progesterone levels through week 12. DMPA was well-tolerated and side effects were similar to those reported in HIV women on DMPA. NFV- and EFV-based regimens do not appear to be altered by the presence of DMPA. Although NVP AUC levels were higher with DMPA, the increased levels do not appear to be clinically relevant. DMPA appears to be safe and effective for HIV-infected women taking these PI and NNRTI.

Keywords: Antiretroviral pharmacokinetics ; Drug Interactions; Female Contraception