591
Long-term Effect of HAART in Preventing AIDS and Death Compared with No Treatment and with Dual Therapy: The Swiss HIV Cohort Study
Jonathan Sterne*1, M Hernan2, B Ledergerber3, K Tilling1, R Weber3, J Robins2, M Egger4, and the Swiss HIV Cohort Study
1Bristol, UK; 2Boston, MA, USA; 3Zurich, Switzerland; and 4Berne, Switzerland
Background: Evidence of the effect of HAART from
randomized controlled trials is limited because most trials use surrogate
endpoints such as CD4 count or virologic response,
and follow-up is often for short periods. There has been no placebo-controlled
randomized trial of HAART. The effectiveness of HAART over several years of
treatment is therefore unknown at present. Most HIV-infected persons now
considering starting HAART have not been treated with other antiretroviral
drugs.
Methods: We
used data from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, an observational study of
HIV-infected residents in Switzerland
aged ³16 years. All participants followed-up after January
1996 were potentially eligible for analysis. Standard
statistical methods (e.g., Cox proportional hazards models) are likely to yield
biased estimates of the effect of HAART in the presence of time-dependent
confounders affected by prior treatment, so we used weighted Cox models
(marginal structural models) to estimate hazard ratios for progression to AIDS
or death. These control confounding by weighting according to the probability
of starting HAART (estimated using logistic regression). In separate models, we
estimated the effect of HAART compared with no treatment and compared with dual
therapy.
Results: Lower CD4 count, increasing HIV-1 viral load and previous
CDC stage B events were associated with an increased risk of starting HAART.
Overall hazard ratios for the effect of HAART on progression to AIDS or death
were 0.07 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.16) compared with no treatment, and 0.48 (0.31 to
0.74) compared with dual therapy (consistent with results from randomized
controlled trials). Compared with no treatment, HAART became more beneficial
with increasing time since initiation. In patients with presumed transmission
via intravenous drug use the hazard ratio was 0.12 (0.04 to 0.33); in other
patients the hazard ratio was 0.05 (0.02 to 0.12) (interaction p = 0.096). Compared with both no
treatment and dual therapy, the beneficial effect of HAART was greater in patients
whose CD4 cell count at baseline was < 200 cells/mL.
Conclusions: To
our knowledge, this is the first study to estimate the effect of HAART compared
with no treatment in reducing rates of progression to AIDS and death. The
substantial beneficial effects of HAART are consistent with observed declines
in rates of AIDS and death in HIV-infected persons observed
in developed countries since the introduction of HAART, and provide a
context for considering adverse effects.
Keywords: Antiretroviral therapy; AIDS; cohort studies