|
|
|
|
|
Session 22
Oral Abstracts Clinical Pharmacology: New Agents, Interactions, and Predictors of Virologic Response Thursday, 10 am - 12:30 pm Presentation Time: 10:15 am Ballroom A |
Background: Establishing a
relationship between drug exposure and long-term virologic response has been
challenging. Major impediments include inconsistent definitions of long-term
response, undefined confounding factors, nonlinear relationships, and interactions
among all factors and antiviral responses.
Methods: We developed a
novel long-term HIV-1 dynamic model with consideration of pharmacokinetics,
drug adherence, and drug susceptibility to link plasma drug concentration to
complete HIV-1 RNA trajectory. A Bayesian approach was used to fit this model
to clinical data from ACTG A5055, a study of 2 dosage regimens of indinavir
(IDV) with ritonavir (RTV) in subjects failing their first protease inhibitor (PI)
treatment. HIV RNA testing was completed at days 0, 7, 14, 28, 56, 84, 112, 140,
and 168. An intensive pharmacokinetic evaluation was performed on day 14 and
multiple trough concentrations were subsequently collected. Pill counts were
used to monitor adherence. IC50 for IDV and RTV was determined at baseline
and at virologic failure. Viral dynamic model fitting residuals were used to
assess the significance of covariate effects on long-term virologic response.
Results: As univariate
predictors, none of the 4 pharmacokinetic K parameters Ctrough, C12h,
Cmax, and AUC0-12h was significantly related to virologic
response (p > 0.05). By including
drug susceptibility (IC50), or IC50 and adherence
together, Ctrough, C12h, Cmax, and AUC0-12h
were each significantly correlated to long-term virologic response (p = 0.0055, 0.0002, 0.0136, 0.0002 with
IC50 and adherence considered). IC50 and adherence alone
were not related to the virologic response. Adherence did not provide any
additional information to pharmacokinetic parameters (p = 0.064), to drug susceptibility IC50 (p = 0.086), and to their combination (p = 0.22) in predicting virologic
response. Simple regression approaches did not detect any significant PD
relationships.
Conclusions: Any single
factor of pharmacokinetics, adherence, and drug susceptibility did not
contribute to long-term virologic response. But their combinations in viral
dynamic modeling significantly predicted virologic response. HIV dynamic
modeling can appropriately capture the complicated nonlinear relationships and
interactions among multiple covariates.
Keywords: Pharmacodynamics; Viral dynamics modeling; prediction of antiviral response
![]() |