Home Search Abstracts Browse Sessions Program Committee View Session E-mail Abstract Author

 

 




Session 100 Poster Abstracts
Strategies of Antiretroviral Therapy
Friday, 1:30 - 3:30 pm
Hall A


574    
Results of Simplified Protease Inhibitor Trial: Antiviral Effect of Once Daily Saquinavir SGC plus Ritonavir vs Twice Daily Indinavir plus Ritonavir
Marianne Harris*1, N Press1, A Thorne2, C Zala3, P Cahn3, C Ochoa3, S Schneider4, B Hanna5, J Singer2, J Montaner1, and the CTN 161 (SPRINT) Study Team
1British Columbia Ctr for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, Canada; 2Canadian HIV Trials Network, Vancouver, Canada; 3Fndn Huésped, Univ of Buenos Aires, Argentina; 4Living Hope Clin Trials Inc, Long Beach, CA, USA; and 5Hlth Svcs Ctr, Hobson City, AL, USA

Background:  Indinavir plus ritonavir (IDV/r) has been compared in a randomized clinical trial to twice-daily saquinavir SGC plus ritonavir (SQV/r), but not to once-daily SQV/r. Simplified Protease Inhibitor Trial (SPRINT) was a prospective, randomized, open-label trial comparing once-daily SQV/r with twice-daily IDV/r, each with 2 reverse transcriptase inhibitors, with respect to proportions of patients with plasma viral load <50 copies/mL at 24 and 48 weeks.

Methods:  We randomized 164 HIV+ adults to receive either SQV/r 1600 mg/100 mg once daily or IDV/r 800 mg/100 mg twice daily, with either 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) or 1 NRTI plus 1 non-NRTI (NNRTI) as selected by the treating physician. Eligible patients had a viral load of > 5000 copies/mL and were either protease inhibitor- (PI-) naïve, or had no evidence of PI resistance. Viral load, CD4, safety labs, and fasting lipids and glucose were assessed at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48. Follow-up was completed in March 2004. Categorical variables were compared between groups using the χ2 Test or Fisher’s Exact Test, as appropriate. Continuous variables were compared using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test. Proportions were analyzed using the binomial test for 2 proportions. Viral load of > 100,000 (5.0 log10) copies/mL were set to 5.0 log10.

Results:  The efficacy analysis included 147 evaluable patients. At baseline, the SQV/r (n = 70) and IDV/r (n = 77) groups were similar with respect to:  median age of 40 years, 79% male, 80% PI-naïve, 62% viral load of >5.0 log10 copies/mL, median CD4 130 cells/mm3. Background regimens included a NNRTI in 3 patients on IDV/r and 0 on SQV/r. The SQV/r and IDV/r arms did not differ with respect to proportions of patients with viral load of <50 copies/mL by intent-to-treat analysis at either week 24 (56%, 49%, p = 0.44) or week 48 (50%, 45%, p = 0.70). CD4 increases to week 48 were also similar between arms (SQV/r 147 cells/mm3, IDV/r 131 cells/mm3, p = 0.60). However, 29 of 77 (38%) patients discontinued IDV/r by week 48 due to adverse events, mainly renal or gastrointestinal, as compared with 10 of 70 (14%) who discontinued SQV/r (p < 0.01; 95% CI from IDV/r > by 8% to IDV/r > by 38%). No differences were observed between arms with respect to changes in fasting lipids or glucose from baseline to either week 24 or 48 (n = 89, p > 0.1).

Conclusions:  In patients with PI-susceptible HIV, once-daily SQV/r and twice-daily IDV/r, each with 2 reverse transcriptase inhibitors, are equally effective in achieving viral load of < 50 copies/mL at 24 and 48 weeks, and have similar effects on fasting lipids and glucose. However, the IDV/r arm had a higher rate of discontinuation due to adverse effects.

Keywords: protease inhibitors; saquinavir; indinavir