|
|
|
|
|
Session 100
Poster Abstracts Strategies of Antiretroviral Therapy Friday, 1:30 - 3:30 pm Hall A |
Background: Indinavir plus ritonavir (IDV/r) has been compared in a randomized
clinical trial to twice-daily saquinavir SGC plus ritonavir (SQV/r), but not to once-daily SQV/r. Simplified
Protease Inhibitor Trial (SPRINT) was a prospective, randomized, open-label
trial comparing once-daily SQV/r with twice-daily IDV/r, each with 2 reverse
transcriptase inhibitors, with respect to proportions of patients with plasma
viral load <50 copies/mL at 24 and 48 weeks.
Methods: We randomized 164 HIV+ adults to
receive either SQV/r 1600 mg/100 mg once daily or IDV/r 800 mg/100 mg twice
daily, with either 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) or 1
NRTI plus 1 non-NRTI (NNRTI) as selected by the treating physician. Eligible
patients had a viral load of > 5000 copies/mL and
were either protease inhibitor- (PI-) naïve, or had no evidence of PI
resistance. Viral load, CD4, safety labs, and fasting lipids and glucose were
assessed at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48. Follow-up was completed in March
2004. Categorical variables were compared between groups using the χ2
Test or Fisher’s Exact Test, as appropriate. Continuous variables were compared
using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test. Proportions were
analyzed using the binomial test for 2 proportions. Viral load of > 100,000
(5.0 log10) copies/mL were set to 5.0 log10.
Results: The efficacy analysis included 147 evaluable patients. At baseline, the SQV/r (n = 70) and
IDV/r (n = 77) groups were similar with respect to: median age of 40 years, 79% male, 80% PI-naïve,
62% viral load of >5.0 log10 copies/mL,
median CD4 130 cells/mm3. Background regimens included a NNRTI in 3
patients on IDV/r and 0 on SQV/r. The SQV/r and IDV/r arms did not differ with
respect to proportions of patients with viral load of <50 copies/mL by intent-to-treat analysis at either week 24 (56%, 49%,
p = 0.44) or week 48 (50%, 45%, p = 0.70). CD4 increases to week 48 were
also similar between arms (SQV/r 147 cells/mm3, IDV/r 131 cells/mm3,
p = 0.60). However, 29 of 77 (38%)
patients discontinued IDV/r by week 48 due to adverse events, mainly renal or
gastrointestinal, as compared with 10 of 70 (14%) who discontinued SQV/r (p < 0.01; 95% CI from IDV/r > by
8% to IDV/r > by 38%). No differences were observed between arms with
respect to changes in fasting lipids or glucose from baseline to either week 24
or 48 (n = 89, p > 0.1).
Conclusions:
In patients with PI-susceptible HIV,
once-daily SQV/r and twice-daily IDV/r, each with 2 reverse transcriptase
inhibitors, are equally effective in achieving viral load of < 50 copies/mL at 24 and 48 weeks, and have similar effects on fasting
lipids and glucose. However, the IDV/r arm had a higher rate of discontinuation
due to adverse effects.
Keywords: protease inhibitors; saquinavir; indinavir
![]() |