Home Search Abstracts Browse Sessions Program Committee View Session E-mail Abstract Author

 

 




Session 120 Poster Abstracts
Interactions among RTI Resistance Mutations
Wednesday, 1:30 - 3:30 pm
Hall A


704    
Contribution of Non-Thymidine Analog Nucleoside RT Inhibitor Associated Mutations to Phenotypic Hypersusceptibility to Efavirenz
E Coakley and Neil Parkin*
ViroLogic, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA

Background:  Efavirenz (EFV) hypersusceptibility has been associated with thymidine analog mutations (TAM) and superior clinical outcomes in subjects treated with EFV. Recent studies have highlighted the activity and resistance profiles of a variety of thymidine analog-sparing nucleoside analog combinations (TA-NAM). Therefore we evaluated the effect of non-TA NAM on EFV susceptibility within the virologic database.

Methods:  EFV hypersusceptibility was defined as fold-change < 0.4 using the phenosense assay. Isolates with unmixed nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutations (K65R, T69X, L74IV, V75X, M184IV; X = any non-wild type amino acid) but no TAM (M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215FY, K219X), Q151M, T69 insertions or NNRTI mutations (A98G, L100I, K101EP, K103NS, V106AM, Y181X, Y188X, G190X, P225X, F227X, M230L, P236L) were identified. Isolates without NRTI, NNRTI or PI mutations served as a wild type reference group.

 

Results:

*p = 0.03 excluding a single outlier with EFV fold change = 13.

 

Mean EFV fold change was lower for isolates with 1 NAM than wild type (p < 0.0001) and 2 than 1 NAM (p = 0.0006). When analyzed by specific mutation, samples with only K65R, T69X OR M184IV demonstrated significantly reduced EFV fold change than wild tyype. Further, the effect was greater for K65R than T69X (p = 0.041) but M184IV (p = 0.1). Isolates with K65R+M184IV had lower mean EFV fold change than M184IV alone (p < 0.0001) but not lower than K65R alone (p = 0.12). NNRTI susceptibilities were measured in site-directed mutants bearing K65R in an NL4-3 background; fold change to EFV, nevirapine (NVP), and delavirdine (DLV) were 0.56 ± 0.02, 0.53 ± 0.05, and 0.54 ± 0.03, respectively (mean ± SD of 18 replicates).

Conclusions:  Groups of viruses containing the specific non-TA NAM K65R, T69X, M184IV, and K65R+M184IV demonstrate enhanced EFV susceptibility. An NL4-3/K65R site-directed mutants demonstrated significantly lower mean fold change to EFV, NPV, and DLV. Thus EFV hypersusceptibility is associated with both non-TA NAM in addition to TAM. These observations may have relevance to the use of NNRTI in non-TA-NRTI combination regimens and may help explain the superior virologic efficacy of these regimens.

Keywords: efavirenz; hypersusceptibility; reverse transcriptase