132
Control of Viremia after Antiretroviral Treatment and Therapeutic Vaccination with Novel Forms of DNA Vaccines in Chronically SIVmac251-infected Macaques
B Felber1, A von Gegerfelt1, M Rosati1, C Alicea1, P Roth1, J Bear1, A Valentin1, J Boyer2, D Weiner2, N Bischofberger3, P Markham4, P Albert5, G Franchini5, and George Pavlakis*1
1NCI-Frederick, NIH, DHHS, MD, USA; 2Univ of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; 3Gilead, Foster City, CA, USA; 4Advanced BioSciences Laboratories, Inc., Kensington, MD, USA; and 5NCI, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA
Background: ART leads to drastic reduction in viral
burden, but HIV (or SIV in macaques) remaining in pharmacological sanctuaries,
rebounds rapidly upon treatment interruption. Immune restoration methods are
highly desirable. We explored therapeutic immunization of ART-treated SIVmac251-infected rhesus
macaques, using a new generation of DNA-based
vaccine vectors that produce either secreted or intracellularly
degraded antigens.
Methods: Macaques infected for 15 to 70 weeks with SIVmac251
were treated with a combination of PMPA, didanosine (ddI), and stavudine for 13 to 23
weeks. During this time, the animals were vaccinated intramuscularly with
various optimized forms of DNA vectors expressing SIV antigens and then
released from treatment. The animals were monitored for rebounding virus and
changes in SIV-specific immune responses during and after termination of
therapy. Statistical analyses were performed for all the animals at least
partially responding to ART by reducing viremia.
Results: The benefit of immunotherapy was determined by
comparing average viremia or alternatively the area
under the curve per time unit, for the periods before ART
start and after ART release. We
found that 6 of 12 ART-treated and
vaccinated animals had substantial decreases in virus loads, some for periods
up to 70 weeks, and reached levels below the detection of the virus load assay.
An additional 3 animals had substantial reductions in viremia
after ART and immunotherapy.
Analysis of 13 animals that received only ART
showed that none controlled viremia after release
from ART. Macaques receiving DNA
showed a significant decrease in viral load after therapy termination (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon
rank sum test). Therefore,
DNA vaccination, but not ART alone led to substantial decreases in viremia. In addition, measurement of cellular immune
responses showed induction of SIV-specific cellular immune responses during
therapy. The animals controlling viremia had
persistent cellular immune responses after release from ART.
Conclusions: The combination of novel forms of DNA vaccines administered during ART treatment induced an immune response able to
control viremia after removal of ART. Importantly, animals able to control virus
maintained this ability for more than a year after ART
termination. Therefore, optimized DNA
vectors may be beneficial either alone or in combination with other vaccine
modalities as an addition to antiretroviral treatment.
Keywords: chronic infection; immunotherapy; DNA vaccination