|
|
|
|
|
Session 104
Poster Abstracts Adherence, Quality of Life, and Factors Related to Treatment Friday, 1:30 - 3:30 pm Hall A |
Background: Antiretroviral (ARV) adherence at the 95%
level has been identified as the minimum level of adherence to suppress the
majority of individuals to an HIV viral load to < 400 copies/mL. Recent therapies, including non-nucleoside reverse
transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) regimens, lead to better viral suppression than
single protease-inhibitor (PI) therapies in clinical trials. We examined
adherence and viral suppression in single-PI and NNRTI-based regimens using 2 validated, objective measures of adherence: unannounced pill
counts (
Methods: Subjects were recruited from the REACH Cohort and were included if they were on single-PI or
NNRTI ARV regimens for at least 3 months prior to study baseline. Adherence was
measured by unannounced pill counts in all individuals and electronic
medication monitoring in those without mediset pill
box organizers. The primary outcome was suppression of HIV viral RNA to < 400
copies/mL. Adherence categories were defined by unannounced
pill counts quartiles.
Results: We followed 110
patients (56 on PI and 54 on NNRTI) for a median of 9.1 months. unannounced pill count data were available on all patients
and electronic medication monitoring data were available on 65 patients not
using medisets. Viral suppression to < 400 copies
was common in individuals on NNRTI-regimens in the highest 3 quartiles of
adherence (54 to 100% adherence) whereas viral suppression was only seen in the
majority those with greater than 95% adherence to single-PI therapy (see the table
below). The odds of virologic suppression were 5.6
times higher for patients on NNRTI regimens than with patients on single-PI
regimens when controlling for adherence and other potential confounders (nadir
CD4, ARV treatment duration, mono/dual nucleoside exposure) in a multivariable
analysis (p = 0.0011). There was no
statistically significant difference in adherence by unannounced pill counts in
patients receiving NNRTI versus single-PI-containing regimens.
|
Percentage
of Individuals with HIV Viral Load of < 400 copies/mL |
||||||||||
|
|
Adherence |
|
||||||||
|
|
0 to 53 |
54 to 73 |
74 to 93 |
94 to 100 |
p for χ2 Trend |
|||||
|
Regimen |
|
EMM |
|
EMM |
|
EMM |
|
EMM |
|
EMM |
|
PI |
14% |
23% |
31% |
33% |
64% |
67% |
67% |
83% |
0.001 |
0.005 |
|
NNRIT |
31% |
33% |
75% |
100% |
62% |
86% |
92% |
75% |
0.004 |
0.03 |
|
Subjects(n) |
27 |
19 |
28 |
20 |
27 |
12 |
28 |
14 |
|
|
Conclusions: NNRTI regimens can lead to viral suppression
at less than 95% adherence. While NNRTI potency may lead to viral suppression
at moderate levels of adherence, near complete adherence improves the
probability of durable viral suppression for all regimen types.
Keywords: adherence ; NNRTI; protease inhibitor
![]() |