902
A Randomized Trial of Standard versus Enhanced Risk Reduction Counseling for Individuals Receiving Post-exposure Prophylaxis following Sexual Exposures to HIV
Michelle Roland*1, T Neilands1, M Krone1, K Franses1, M Chesney1,2, J Kahn1, T Coates3, and J Martin1
1Univ of California, San Francisco, US; 2NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, US; and 3David Geffen Sch of Med, Univ of California, Los Angeles Med Ctr, US
Background: The potential for behavioral disinhibition is a
concern with post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) following sexual exposures. In
prior work, PEP plus enhanced (5 session) risk reduction counseling did not
result in increased risk behavior. Such counseling, however, is expensive and
not superior to standard (2 session) counseling in other settings. Thus, we
hypothesized that 2 counseling sessions are not inferior to 5 sessions in the
context of PEP.
Methods: Persons treated with PEP following sexual exposure
were randomized to standard (2 session) vs enhanced (5 session) counseling. The
groups were compared for differences in: a) change in no. of unprotected sex
acts 6 to 12 months post-PEP compared to 6 months pre-PEP; b) 12 month
incidence of further PEP use (re-PEP); and c) 12 month incidence of HIV
acquisition. Non-inferiority analyses estimated one-sided 95% CIs to determine
the greatest (“worst case”) differences between groups.
Results: 457 subjects were randomized to standard (STND;
n=229) or enhanced (ENH; n=228) counseling. Median age was 34, 96% were men,
71% were white, and 72% were insured. Overall, there was a reduction at 12
months in the number of unprotected sex acts compared to baseline (mean 1.8 and
2.3 fewer acts in the STND and ENH groups respectively). This differed by the
degree of baseline risk: among those with < 4 baseline acts, the ENH
group had a slight increase (mean +1.6 acts) compared to the STND group. Among
those with > 4 baseline acts, the ENH group had a mean of 6.2 fewer acts
than the STND group. Differences in re-PEP and HIV acquisition followed the
same pattern: those with < 4 baseline acts had little difference
between counseling groups, while those with > 4 acts had important
differences.
Cumulative incidence of re-PEP
|
Cumulative incidence of HIV acquisition
|
|
Subjects
|
STND
|
ENH
|
STND
minus
ENH
|
Upper bound
95% CI
|
STND
|
ENH
|
STND
minus
ENH
|
Upper bound
95% CI
|
|
All
|
23.7%
|
16.9%
|
+6.8%
|
+13.8%
|
2.9%
|
2.6%
|
+0.28%
|
+3.4%
|
|
< 4 baseline sex acts
|
21.1%
|
17.2%
|
+3.9%
|
+11.8%
|
0.67%
|
2.7%
|
-2.1%
|
+0.8%
|
|
> 4 baseline sex acts
|
31.5%
|
17.1%
|
+14.5%
|
+30.7%
|
12.3%
|
2.4%
|
+9.9%
|
+20.4%
|
Conclusion:
In persons
with lower baseline risk who seek PEP following sexual exposures, standard
counseling is not inferior with respect to reducing subsequent risk behavior.
However, among those with higher baseline risk, standard and enhanced
counseling are not equivalent. Enhanced counseling should be targeted to
individuals who report higher baseline risk.
|