478
Clinical Safety of HIV Lipopeptides Used as Vaccines in Healthy Volunteers and HIV-infected Adults
Christine Durier*1, O Launay2, V Meiffrédy1, Y Saïdi1, D Salmon2, Y Lévy3, J G Guillet4, G Pialoux5, and J P Aboulker1
1INSERM SC10, Villejuif, France; 2Hosp Cochin, Paris, France; 3Hosp Henri Mondor, Creteil, France; 4INSERM U567, Paris, France; and 5Hosp Tenon, Paris, France
Background: Since 1994, the French National Agency for AIDS
Research (ANRS) has developed HIV-1 lipopeptides for
use as candidate vaccine against HIV. A case of myelitis
occurring in 1 volunteer of HVTN042/ANRS VAC019 trial
and previously reported uveitis in 2 French volunteers
triggered the need of a global review of clinical safety of HIV lipopeptides.
Methods: A meta-analysis to examine
clinical safety data collected during the 10 ANRS clinical trials using HIV-1 lipopeptides (8 preventive and 2 therapeutic trials)
conducted in France
between 1996 and 2005. Five different lipopeptide
constructs were tested alone or in combination with recombinant canarypox HIV vaccines or with an immunological adjuvant
(QS21) and with different diluents. Specific focus on events
that could constitute symptoms of an ophthalmological
or neurological complication of lipopeptide
vaccination.
Results: Of 248 trial participants, only
7 did not complete follow-up among the 200 healthy volunteers (3 refusals, 1
for local reaction, 1 for arthralgia, and 2 for
health changes not related to vaccination) and 1 among the 48 HIV-1-infected
patients. During the 354 person-years of follow-up, 860 lipopeptide
injections were administered. Local reactions were common. However, without adjuvant
and with an appropriate diluent, none of the vaccinees experienced severe local response. Systemic
reactions were mild and transient. The most common systemic adverse effects were
asthenia (21.1%), fever (16.9%), and headache (21.5%). No grade 4 reaction was reported, and only 18
subjects experienced grade 3 systemic events related to the vaccination mainly
asthenia, fever, headache, and arthralgia.
Multivariate analysis showed that female gender, number of injections, and diluent (more reactions in 5% glucose alone than in
combination with Tris-HCl buffer) increased
significantly systemic reactions related to the vaccination. Specific review of
ophthalmological events (23 in 19 volunteers; 6 in 4
patients) and neurological events (89 in 50 volunteers; 15 in 13 patients)
showed that, except 1 case of anterior uveitis for
which a relationship could not be eliminated, there was no other symptom
suggestive of an ophthalmological or neurological
complication attributable to lipopeptide vaccination.
Conclusions: These data support that reactogenicity
and systemic safety of HIV lipopeptide vaccines are
acceptable both in healthy volunteers and HIV-infected adults.
|