Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 69 Poster Abstracts
Neuropathogenesis: Clinical Correlates and Observational Studies
Session Day and Time: Wednesday, 1:30 - 3:30 pm
Poster Hall


352
HIV DNA Correlates with HIV-1-associated Dementia in ART-naive Patients
Bruce Shiramizu*1, S Nidhinandana2, P Sithinamsuwan2, W Apateerapong1, S Ratto-Kim1,3, G Watt1, K Robertson4, R Paul5, C Shikuma1, V Valcour1, and South East Asia Research Collaboration with Hawaii (SEARCH)
1Univ of Hawaii, John A Burns Sch of Med, Honolulu, US; 2Phramongkutklao Med Ctr, Bangkok, Thailand; 3Armed Forces Res Inst of the Med Sci, Bangkok, Thailand; 4Univ of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, US; and 5Brown Med Sch, Miriam Hosp, Providence, RI, US

Background:  Increase in HIV-1 proviral DNA (HIV DNA) is strongly associated (OR = 2.83, 1.57 to 5.08) with a diagnosis of HIV-1-associated dementia (HAD) vs normal cognition among patients heavily treated with ART. There is extensive controversy as to whether the HAD currently seen in populations with ready-access to ART are similar to that seen in the era prior to the availability of potent ART, and no data are available on whether an association of HIV DNA and HAD would be seen in ART-naïve individuals presenting with HAD. A unique opportunity exists to study the phenomena among ART-naive HIV-1-infected patients with and without HAD in Thailand prior to initiation of treatment. The goal of the study was to determine if baseline HIV DNA is associated and a marker for HAD in ART-naïve subjects.

Methods:  Following informed-consent, subjects enrolled in the SEARCH Cohort as per guidelines established by local IRB. From the cohort, patients with HAD (n = 12), HIV-1-infected non-HAD patients (n = 12), matched for age, gender, education, and CD4 cell count; and matched HIV-1-seronegative controls (n = 12) for comparison had peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained and analyzed for HIV DNA at entry. HIV DNA was assessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Diagnosis of dementia was based on AAN 1991 criteria. The Student’s t-test was used to analyze the HIV-1-infected groups.

Results:  HIV DNA was significantly higher in HAD (n = 12, mean 2.20 [0.25]) vs non-HAD (n = 12, mean 0.73 [0.39]), calculated as log10 HIV DNA copy/106 cells, p = 0.024. No HIV DNA was found in seronegative controls (n = 12). Mean baseline HIV-1 RNA levels (copies/mL):CD4 cell counts (cells/mL) from HAD and non-HAD subjects were 274,000 (range 23,000 to 750,000):73 (range 3 to 318) and 288,000 (range 892,000 to 750,000):61 (range 8 to 222), respectively, showing no difference.

 

Text Box:    Log10 HIV DNA/106 Cells

 

Conclusions:  High HIV DNA is a marker of HAD, not only in subjects on potent ART, as previously reported but also in ART-naïve subjects. Subjects enrolled in the SEARCH Cohort, diagnosed with HAD at baseline, showed a significant elevation in HIV DNA compared to individuals without HAD. This suggests that high HIV DNA may be a novel marker suggesting a potential role in the pathogenesis of HAD.