597
Continued GP41 Evolution after Interruption of Enfuvirtide: Evidence for Ongoing Immunologic Pressure in Advanced HIV Disease
Christina Kitchen*1, M Suchard1, J Lu2, R Hoh3, D Kuritzkes2, and S Deeks3
1David Geffen Sch of Med, Univ of California, Los Angeles Med Ctr, US; 2Brigham and Women's Hosp, Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA, US; and 3Univ of California, San Francisco, US
Background: Careful examination of viral dynamics during
treatment can provide important insights into HIV pathogenesis. Here, we
examined viral evolution during and after enfuvirtide (T20) treatment with an
objective of defining the characteristics of viral evolution during advanced
HIV immunodeficiency.
Methods: We examined the viral quasi-species from 9 patients
who experienced incomplete viral suppression on a T20-based regimen, and who
subsequently interrupted enfuvirtide while remaining on a stable background
regimen (T20 partial treatment interruption). An average of 8 clones was
sequenced from 3 time-points: pre-T20,
post-T20 failure, and post-T20 interruption. We used a Bayesian hierarchical
phylogenetic model to assess the evolutionary relatedness of the virus that
emerged after T20 interruption to the strains sequenced before initiation of T20
and strains sequenced before the interruption. This method allowed us to
explicitly test evolutionary hypotheses across patients and time points
simultaneously while allowing for individual patient evolutionary parameters to
vary.
Results: Interruption of T20 was associated with rapid
loss of gp41-associated resistance mutations in all subjects. This loss of
resistance reflected continued viral evolution of the dominant quasi-species at
the time of the interruption rather than re-emergence of an archived virus (Bayes factor = 30.2, p
= 0.01). Furthermore, we found that patients with the highest support for ongoing
viral evolution during interruption period (>99% posterior probability) had
a greater increase in diversity during T20 therapy (n = 4). Patients with no change in diversity also had strong
support for the evolution tree (>90% posterior probability, n = 2). In contrast, patients who had a
decrease in diversity during early T20 therapy had mixed support or weak
support for the evolution tree (n = 3).
Conclusions: In contrast to observations when all drugs
are interrupted, loss of resistance during T20 interruption often occurs because
of ongoing viral evolution (and back-mutation), rather than emergence of an
archived virus. This was particularly true in patients whose virus remained
diverse or became more diverse during enfuvirtide therapy.
Collectively, these observations suggest ongoing immunologic pressure against
envelope in advanced disease, with the emergence of virus population that is immunologically more fit than previous generation of
viruses.
|