Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 107 Poster Abstracts
Epidemiology and Transmission of Resistance
Session Day and Time: Wednesday, 1:30 - 3:30 pm
Poster Hall


648    
Prevalence of Resistance to at Least 1 Drug in Treated HIV-infected Patients with Viral Load >1000 Copies/mL in 2004: A French Nationwide Study
Dominique Costagliola*1, L Morand-Joubert2, L Assoumou1, V Brodard3, J C Plantier4, C Delaugerre5, V Mackiewicz6, S Saidi1, F Brun-Vezinet7, B Masquelier8, and the ANRS AC11 Resistance Study Group
1U720 INSERM and Univ Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France; 2Hosp St Antoine, Paris, France; 3Univ Hosp, Reims, France; 4Univ Hosp, Rouen, France; 5Necker Univ Hosp, Paris, France; 6Univ Hosp Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France; 7Hosp Bichat, Paris, France; and 8Univ Hosp Bordeaux, France

Background:  Surveillance of resistance in treated patients with detectable viral load is important both because of the risk of spreading resistant viruses and to evaluate proportion of patients for which new drugs with minimal cross-resistance are needed

Methods:  Resistance mutations were systematically sought in samples from 481 consecutive treated HIV-infected patients with viral load >1000 copies/mL seen in 27 specialized centers throughout metropolitan France and 1 in Switzerland with a prescription for viral load in June 2004. The protease, reverse transcriptase (RT), and gp41 genes of plasma virions were sequenced. Primary and secondary protease, RT, and gp41 gene mutations were identified from the International AIDS Society resistance testing USA panel. The genotype results were interpreted for each drug by using the ANRS algorithm (July 2005 version 13). Weighted analyses were used to derive representative estimates of the percentage of patients with resistance mutations and resistance to a drug with the weight base on the number of patients followed in each center. Results are expressed with median and interquartile range or percentage.

Results:  Known duration of HIV infection was 12 years (8.0 to 16.0), patients had been exposed to 9 ART (6 to 12), 12.3% had received enfuvirtide (T20). The viral load was 4.0 (3.5 to 4.7) copies/mL and the CD4 cell count 265 (145 to 430)/mm3. In terms of resistance mutations, 4 (1 to 6) mutations to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) were detected, 3 (2 to 6) to protease inhibitors (PI) and 0 (0 to 1) to non-NRTI (NNRTI). Resistance to at least 1 ART was observed in 88.8% of patients, to at least 1 NRTI in 77.2%, 1 PI in 66.5%, and 1 NNRTI in 50.3%. The number of drugs to which the viruses were not sensitive was 3 NRTI (1 to 5), 1 PI (0 to 5), and 1 NNRTI (0 to 2). The percentage of patients with viruses with no sensitive drugs in the NRTI family was 18.3%; 6.5% in the PI family; 49.1% in the NNRTI family; and 6.6% for T20. Overall 19.8% of patients had viruses with no sensitive drugs in at least 2 families of drugs.

Conclusions:  In France, 80.3 % of patients followed in hospital were receiving ART in 2004 and only 21.3% had a viral load >1000 copies/mL. Therefore, although resistance to at least 1 ART was frequent in treated patients with a viral load >1000 copies/mL, only 18.9% of treated patients could contribute to the transmission of resistant viruses and among those in care, only 3.4% of patients with complete resistance to at least 2 families of drugs are in urgent need of new drugs with limited cross-resistance.