900
Vulnerable Populations and Special Protections in ACTUs and HPTN
Sohini Sengupta* and R Strauss
Univ of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, US
Objective: Vulnerability
is a central concept in protecting both the rights and the welfare of human
subjects in research. The current
standards by which we determine a vulnerable population has been argued by
ethicists to be both narrow and broad in scope.
The objective of this study was to develop a conceptual framework for
better understanding the characteristics of vulnerability in clinical trial
research, focusing on AIDS Clinical and HIV Prevention Trials.
Methods: Study
design was cross-sectional and exploratory, using qualitative methods. A total of 19 study coordinators and 19
investigators from AIDS Clinical Trial Units (ACTUs) and the HIV Prevention
Trial Network (HPTN) participated in this study. Telephone interviews were conducted with each
participant. Participants were asked to define
vulnerable populations, and provide feedback on the current categories of
vulnerable populations with special protections identified in 45 CFR 46,
subparts B, C, and D. Audiotapes of the
interviews were transcribed to text and analyzed qualitatively. Text analysis yielded a conceptual framework
exploring vulnerable populations in HIV/AIDS clinical and prevention research.
Results: Social,
research-oriented, or HIV/AIDS-specific characteristics were elicited when
asked the question defining a vulnerable population. Social characteristics included substance
abuse, and being economically disadvantaged.
Research-oriented vulnerabilities included not understanding the process
of research, or what is required of them as study participants. And, HIV/AIDS-specific vulnerabilities
included experiencing stigma, and lacking access to HIV care and treatment. Although participants agreed that the
categories of vulnerability delineated in the regulations were acceptable, they
identified examples of overprotection for, or reasons why pregnant women,
prisoners, and children should not always be considered vulnerable in research.
Conclusion: This study broadens our understanding of
vulnerable populations by exploring the perspectives of HIV/AIDS researchers,
and the conceptual framework developed challenges current thinking about the
current categories of vulnerable populations for which special protections are
stated.
|