Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 144 Poster Abstracts
Therapy of Hepatitis C Infection
Session Day and Time: Tuesday, 1:30 - 3:30 pm
Poster Hall


861    
Efficacy of Pegylated Interferon + Ribavirin in HIV/HCV Co-infection uutside of Well-circumscribed Clinical Trials: The Andalusian Multicenter Study
J Mira1, J Torre-Cisneros2, D Merino3, M Ríos4, A Collado5, S Vergara1, A Rivero2, J Lomas-Cabeza3, Juan Macías*1, J Pineda1, and the Grupo Andaluz para el Estudio de las Enfermedades Infecciosas
1Hosp de Valme, Sevilla, Spain; 2Hosp Univ Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain; 3Hosp Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain; 4Hosp Univ Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain; and 5Hosp Torrecárdenas, Almería, Spain

Background:  Recently, 4 randomized controlled trials have been published comparing the efficacy of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) with that of standard interferon (IFN) and RBV for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in HIV-co-infected patients. In these trials, the new regimen was superior to the combination of standard IFN/RBV. Thus, the overall sustained virological response rate with the PEG-IFN/RBV combination ranged from 27 to 44% in these trials. To date, however, there is little information about the efficacy of the PEG-IFN/RBV combination, used in real conditions, in subjects with HIV and HCV infections. Our objective was to assess the efficacy of PEG-INF + RBV in a clinical cohort of HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Methods:  All HIV/HCV-co-infected patients who received at least 1 dose of the PEG-IFN/RBV combination between June 2000 and February 2005 in southern Spain, were included in the study. Patients were treated with PEG-IFN-a-2a (180µg weekly) or PEG-IFNa-2b (1.5 µg/kg weekly) and RBV (800 to 1200 mg/day) for 24 or 48 weeks. Patients discontinued the therapy at week 12 in the absence of an early virological response. The primary endpoint was the rate of sustained virological response, defined as undetectable HCV RNA in serum at 24 weeks after cessation the therapy. Secondary endpoints were rates of early virological response and viral response at the end of treatment, and percentage of premature discontinuation of the therapy. Viral response was measured on an intention-to-treat-basis.

Results:  We included 145 patients in this study. Viral response at the end of treatment and sustained virological response were observed in 64 (44%) and 47 (32%) individuals, respectively. Among the 86 subjects with genotype 1 or 4, 16 (19%) achieved sustained virological response, whereas 31 (53%) of 59 individuals carrying genotypes 2 or 3 did so. Of the subjects with genotypes 1 or 4, and with genotypes 2 or 3, 29 (34%) and 3 (5%) did not reach early virological response, respectively. After end of treatment, 17 (12%) patients relapsed, 24 (16%) individuals discontinued therapy due to adverse events, and 13 (9%) were lost to follow-up or refused to continue the therapy.

Conclusions:  The efficacy of the PEG-IFN/RBV in HIV/HCV-co-infected patients outside of well-circumscribed trials is much lower than in most clinical trials. This is attributable to a high rate of nonresponders among those with HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection.