231 
Substitution of Membrane Active Peptides into the HIV-1 Tryptophan-rich Membrane Proximal External Region of gp41 Can Preserve Fusion but not Infectivity
Sundaram Ajay Vishwanathan* and E Hunter
Emory Univ, Atlanta, GA, US
Background: The established role of the
gp41 tryptophan (W)-rich membrane proximal external
region (MPER) (K665WASWNWFN674ITNW678LWYIK) in
HIV-1 fusion and the presence of broadly neutralizing epitopes
(including 2F5 and 4E10) make it an important domain for study. The MPER is
known to be membrane-disruptive, and the aromatic residues form a “collar”
along the helix potentially enabling “velcro-like”
interactions with the viral membrane. In this study, the importance of MPER
collar arrangement and bilayer-destabilizing
properties in fusion was examined.
Methods: “Phase” mutants (D674, insA674, ins674-675) were created that
disrupt the collar, and several membrane-disruptive chimera (MDC) were designed
that replaced the MPER with part of or the entire W-rich antimicrobial indolicidin peptide (ILPWKWPWWPWRR)
and its alanine-substituted variant CP10A, yielding KWILPWKWPWWPWRRAYIK
(Ind1), and KWILAWKWAWWAWRRAYIK (CP1). We designed 2 MDC with a
spacer (ITN) before W678, KWILP/AWKWP/AWITNWP/AWYIK
(Ind2 and CP2), to mimic MPER W-spacing. Finally, the 2 arginines
in Ind1 were substituted with alanines (KWILPWKWPWWPWAAAYIK
(Ind3). Cell-cell fusion and viral entry were quantitated
using a luciferase assay and JC53BL indicator cells.
Results: The phase mutants retained
fusion efficiencies up to 58% of WT, arguing that a strict a-helical organization of this region is not
critical for fusion. This conclusion is supported by the surprising observation
that substitution of the proline-rich indolicidin peptide yielded low levels of fusion (5%) that
were increased to 33% that of WT if the charged arginines
were replaced by alanines. The Ind2 mutant, that lacks charges and has a W-spacing similar to
MPER, retained fusion up to 46% of WT even though it is highly proline-rich. CP1 (~1%) and CP2 (~7%) showed fusion
efficiencies lower than Ind1 and Ind2, respectively, implying that the capacity
to form an a-helix is not crucial for fusion. Viral entry of all the mutants was
dramatically reduced, with the best (insA674) exhibiting only ~1% that of
WT.
Conclusions: The replacement of HIV-1 gp41 MPER with a proline-rich membrane-disruptive peptide does not prevent
fusion, strongly indicating that the aromatic collar and a-helical potential are not essential for this
function. In contrast, the same substitutions effectively block viral entry,
suggesting that other structural constraints are imposed on this region,
possibly at the level of glycoprotein incorporation.
|