25
Routine HIV Testing in Botswana: A Population-based Study on Attitudes, Practices, and Human Rights Concerns
Sheri Weiser*1, M Heisler2, K Leiter3, F Percy-De Korte3, S Tlou4, S Demonner2, N Phaladze4, D Bangsberg5, and V Iacopino3
1Ctr for AIDS Prevention Studies, Univ of California, San Francisco, US; 2VA Ann Arbor Hlth System, Univ of Michigan Sch of Med, US; 3Physicians for Human Rights, Cambridge, MA, US; 4Univ of Botswana, Gaborone; and 5San Francisco Gen Hosp, Univ of California, US
Background: The
Botswana government implemented a policy of routine HIV testing in 2004 in
response to the high prevalence of HIV infection estimated at 37% of adults. We
assessed knowledge of and attitudes towards routine testing, correlates of HIV
testing, and barriers and facilitators to testing 11 months after the
introduction of this policy.
Methods: A
cross-sectional population-based study was conducted in November and December
of 2004 among 1,268 adults from 5 districts of Botswana using a stratified
two-stage probability sample design. Descriptive statistics were used to
examine sample characteristics and attitudes. Multivariate logistic regression
was used to assess correlates of self-reported HIV testing, which was the
primary outcome of interest.
Results: Most
participants (82%) reported being extremely or very much in favor of routine
testing. The majority believed that this policy would decrease barriers to
testing (89%), HIV-related stigma (60%), and violence towards women (55%) and
would increase access to antiretroviral treatment (93%). At the same time, 43%
of participants believed that routine testing would lead people to avoid going
to the doctor for fear of testing, and 14% believed that this policy could
increase gender-based violence related to testing. The prevalence of
self-reported HIV testing was 48%.
Adjusted correlates of testing included female gender (AOR=1.5, 95%
CI=1.1-1.9), higher education (AOR=2.0, 95% CI=1.5-2.7), more frequent health care
visits (AOR=1.9, 95% CI=1.3-2.7), perceived access to HIV testing (AOR=1.6, 95%
CI=1.1-2.5), and inconsistent condom use (AOR=1.6, 95% CI=1.2-2.1). People with
stigmatizing attitudes towards people living with HIV/AIDS were less likely to
have been tested for HIV (AOR=0.7, 95% CI=0.5-0.9), and to have heard of
routine testing (AOR= 0.59, 95%CI= 0.45-0.76). While experiences with testing
were overall positive, 31% felt that they could not refuse the HIV test. Key
barriers to testing included fear of learning one’s status (49%), lack of perceived
risk (43%), and fear of having to change sexual practices with a positive HIV
test (33%).
Conclusions: Routine
testing is widely supported and may reduce barriers to testing in
Botswana. As routine testing is adopted
elsewhere, measures should be implemented to assure true informed consent, and
human rights safeguards including protection from HIV-related discrimination,
and protection of women against partner violence related to testing.
|