Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 23 Oral Abstracts
Antiretroviral Therapy II: New Insights and Treatment Strategies
Session Day and Time: Tuesday, 10 am - 12:30 pm
Presentation Time: 10:15 am
Room: Lecture Hall


102
CD4-guided Scheduled Treatments Interruptions Compared to Continuous Therapy: Results of the Staccato Trial
Jintanat Ananworanich*1, A Gayet-Ageron2, M Le Braz2, W Prasithsirikul3, P Chetchotisakd4, S Kiertiburanakul5, P Phanuphak1, D Cooper6, K Ruxrungtham1, B Hirschel2, and the Staccato Study Group
1HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Res Collaboration, Bangkok; 2Geneva Univ Hosp, Switzerland; 3Bamrasnaradura Inst, Nonthaburi, Thailand; 4Khon Kaen Univ, Thailand; 5Mahidol Univ, Bangkok, Thailand; and 6Natl Ctr in HIV Epidemiology and Clin Res, Univ of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Background:  Stopping HIV therapy may reduce costs and side effects, but carries the risk of increased immune suppression and of emergence of resistance.

Methods:  We randomized 430 patients with CD4 counts >350, and viral load <50 1:2 to either continuous therapy (n = 146) or scheduled treatment interruption (STI) (n = 284), with treatment stops as long as CD4 counts exceeded 350. The median time on randomized treatment was 21.9 months. At the end of the study, both groups were again treated continuously for 12 to 24 weeks. In Thailand, 352 patients received 1600 mg of saquinavir (SQV) with 100 mg of ritonavir (RTV) once daily with 2 nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitors (NRTI):  didanosine/stavudine (ddI/d4T) from 2002 until March 2003, and tenofovir/lamivudine (TDF/3TC) after that. In Swiss and Australian patients, the type of HAART used was defined by the treating physician.

Results:  The probability of restarting treatment in STI was 53% at 6 months, 64% at 12 months, and 74% at 24 months. Drug savings in STI, compared to continuous therapy, amounted to 61.2% during randomized treatment. In an intent-to-treat analysis, the percentage with viral <50 copies was 91.8 % in continuous therapy, compared to 90.3% in STI after re-treatment at the end of the trial (delta 1.6%, 95%CI –4.0 to 7.3%). At the end of randomized treatment, median CD4 counts were 374 in STI (60.5% >350), and 601 in continuous therapy (96.2% >350, p <0.002). After re-treatment, median CD4 counts rose in STI from 374 to 459 after 12 weeks, with 85.9% >350, compared with 96.9% in continuous therapy (p <0.01). During STI, 17 patients (5.8%) had symptoms of acute retroviral syndrome. Diarrhoea (p = 0.04) and neuropathy (p = 0.03) were more frequent in continuous therapy, whereas oral and vulvo-vaginal candidiasis (p = 0.03) and thrombocytopenia (p = 0.06) were more frequent in STI. Sequencing was attempted in 125 patients where resistance was most likely because of numerous stop-start cycles, problems with compliance, and/or viral breakthrough. We observed no resistance mutations in the RT and P genes in 115. Resistance mutations occurred in 7 patients in the RT gene, and 3 in the P gene.

Conclusions:  During 484 patient-years of STI, little evidence of treatment resistance emerged. Treatment-related adverse effects were more frequent in continuous therapy, but minor manifestations of HIV infection were more frequent in STI.