Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 104 Poster Abstracts
Selection, Evolution and Persistence of Drug Resistance
Session Day and Time: Wednesday, 1:30 - 3:30 pm
Poster Hall


622b
CD4-guided Scheduled Treatment Interruptions: Low Incidence of Resistance Mutations in the Staccato Trial
Jintanat Ananworanich*1, B Hirschel2, H Furrer3, S Ubolyam1, A Gayet-Ageron2, A Gayet-Ageron, S Yerly2, T Jupimai1, A Hill4, L Perrin2, K Ruxrungtham1,5, and the Staccato Study Group
1HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Res Collaboration, Bangkok; 2Geneva Univ Hosp, Switzerland; 3Univ Hosp, Berne, Switzerland; 4Univ of Liverpool, UK; and 5Chulalongkorn Univ, Bangkok, Thailand

Background:  The potential risk of increased selection of drug resistance during structured treatment interruptions (STI) must be assessed and balanced with benefits of decreased costs and toxicities.

Methods:  We randomized 430 patients 1:2 to either receive continuous therapy (n = 146), or therapy that ceased as long as the CD4 count exceeded 350 (n = 84). In Thailand, 352 patients (79.1%) received 1600 mg of saquinavir (SQV) with 100 mg of ritonavir (RTV) once daily together with 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI):  didanosine/stavudine (ddI/d4T) from 2002 until March 2003, and tenofovir/lamivudine (TDF/3TC) after that. In Swiss (n = 80) and Australian (n = 6) patients, the type of HAART used was decided by the treating physician (53% non-NRTI [NNRTI], 29% protease inhibitor [PI], 18% 3-NRTI). Direct double-stranded sequencing was performed on an automatic sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Genotypic resistance was defined as specified by the consensus mutation figures of IAS-USA, May/June 2002 version.

Sequencing of the reverse transcriptase and protease genes was attempted in 153 patients where resistance was most likely, i.e. those with ³2 STI-retreatment cycles (n = 108 of 284), or those where viral load was >500 despite treatment (n = 45). In patients with viral rebound during STI, the sample analysed was always the first of those with a viral load >500 during the last STI.

Results:  The median nadir of CD4 counts, before the trial, was 265, range 2 to 1143. The median time on HAART before randomization was 21.6 months. The trial accrued 484 patient-years of observation in the STI group and 262 in the continuous therapy group. Sequence data were available from 125 patients. We observed no resistance mutations in the RT and P genes in 115; 4 patients had resistance to 3TC (all with the 184V mutation), 1 to 3TC and NNRTI (184V plus 103N), 1 to NNRTI only (Y181C), 1 possibly to zidovudine (ZDV) (M41L, and D67N without a history of exposure), and 3 to indinavir (IDV) (M46L/I plus M36I). The relative risk of resistance, compared to treatment with RTV-boosted SQV, was 0.95 (95%CI 0.11 to 7.91) for NNRTI (p = 0.72), and 14.96 (95%CI 3.02 to 74.08) for 3 NRTI (p = 0.01).

Conclusions:  Few resistance mutations occurred during STI. In contrast to other studies, where resistance was more frequently observed, most patients in Staccato were treated with a boosted PI, and HAART duration before STI was relatively short.