Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 151 Poster Abstracts
HIV Prevention: Post-Exposure Prophylaxis
Session Day and Time: Monday, 1:30 - 3:30 pm
Poster Hall


906    
HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Following Sexual Exposure is Started Too Late for Optimal Benefit
Amy Kindrick*, H Tang, C Sterkenberg, C Gruta, P Saberi, M Mahoney, J Cocohoba, D Alexander, J So, and R Goldschmidt
Univ of California, San Francisco, US

Background: Prompt post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with proper antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) is effective in reducing HIV transmission after occupational exposures and might be effective following sexual exposures. The National Clinicians’ Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Hotline (PEPline) provides exposure management consultation to clinicians managing occupational and non-occupational exposures based on Public Health Service guidelines. We reviewed calls to the PEPline to characterize current management of sexual exposures.

Methods: All sexual exposure calls to the PEPline for the period 1/1/04 to 8/30/05 were reviewed. We analyzed characteristics of the exposure, exposed, source, and treatment recommendations for calls concerning specific sexual exposures.

Results: Of 12,895 total PEPline calls, 944 (7%) involved sexual exposures. 64 calls were general questions; 880 concerned specific exposures.  Of the 880 exposure calls, 485 and 283 involved consensual and non-consensual contact, respectively. 113 calls concerned exposed persons already on treatment; the remainder were not on treatment at the time of the call. Calls came primarily from emergency physicians (168) and family physicians (183). Exposed persons were as likely to be men as women, while source persons were predominantly men (76%). 95 exposed persons (11%) were 19 years old or younger; 7 (8%) were younger than 13.  Of the 880 specific exposure calls, nearly all calls concerned exposures that met criteria for PEP. 283 calls (32%) came in within 24 hours of the exposure, 259 (29%) between 24 and 72 hours, and 248 (28%) more than 72 hours after the exposure.

 

Time Since Exposure (hrs)

 

<24

24-72

>72

Unknown

Exposed Gender

 

 

 

 

Male

135

129

94

38

Female

134

96

94

36

Unknown

1

1

2

3

Exposed Age

 

 

 

 

<19

33

22

22

6

=> 19

213

184

159

61

Unknown

24

20

9

10

Source HIV Status

 

 

 

 

Known positive

66

63

5

24

Unknown

204

163

185

53

Nature of Contact

 

 

 

 

Consensual

135

130

122

42

Non-consensual

93

68

50

23

Unknown

42

28

18

12

Conclusions: Time from exposure to PEP decision was longer than current guidelines recommend among the majority of exposures for which the PEPline was consulted. Prompt consultation with experts, including the PEPline, can be essential to ensure that treatment, when indicated, occurs within a time frame recommended by the guidelines.