906 
HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Following Sexual Exposure is Started Too Late for Optimal Benefit
Amy Kindrick*, H Tang, C Sterkenberg, C Gruta, P Saberi, M Mahoney, J Cocohoba, D Alexander, J So, and R Goldschmidt
Univ of California, San Francisco, US
Background: Prompt
post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with proper antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) is effective in reducing HIV transmission after occupational
exposures and might be effective following sexual exposures. The National
Clinicians’ Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Hotline (PEPline)
provides exposure management consultation to clinicians managing occupational
and non-occupational exposures based on Public Health Service guidelines. We
reviewed calls to the PEPline to characterize current
management of sexual exposures.
Methods: All
sexual exposure calls to the PEPline for the period 1/1/04
to 8/30/05 were reviewed. We analyzed characteristics of the exposure, exposed,
source, and treatment recommendations for calls concerning specific sexual
exposures.
Results: Of 12,895
total PEPline calls, 944 (7%) involved sexual
exposures. 64 calls were general questions; 880 concerned specific
exposures. Of the 880 exposure calls,
485 and 283 involved consensual and non-consensual contact, respectively. 113
calls concerned exposed persons already on treatment; the remainder were not on
treatment at the time of the call. Calls came primarily from emergency
physicians (168) and family physicians (183). Exposed persons were as likely to
be men as women, while source persons were predominantly men (76%). 95 exposed
persons (11%) were 19 years old or younger; 7 (8%) were younger than 13. Of the 880 specific exposure calls, nearly
all calls concerned exposures that met criteria for PEP. 283 calls (32%) came
in within 24 hours of the exposure, 259 (29%) between 24 and 72 hours, and 248
(28%) more than 72 hours after the exposure.
|
|
Time Since Exposure (hrs)
|
|
|
<24
|
24-72
|
>72
|
Unknown
|
|
Exposed
Gender
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male
|
135
|
129
|
94
|
38
|
|
Female
|
134
|
96
|
94
|
36
|
|
Unknown
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
Exposed Age
|
|
|
|
|
|
<19
|
33
|
22
|
22
|
6
|
|
=> 19
|
213
|
184
|
159
|
61
|
|
Unknown
|
24
|
20
|
9
|
10
|
|
Source HIV
Status
|
|
|
|
|
|
Known positive
|
66
|
63
|
5
|
24
|
|
Unknown
|
204
|
163
|
185
|
53
|
|
Nature of
Contact
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consensual
|
135
|
130
|
122
|
42
|
|
Non-consensual
|
93
|
68
|
50
|
23
|
|
Unknown
|
42
|
28
|
18
|
12
|
Conclusions: Time
from exposure to PEP decision was longer than current guidelines recommend
among the majority of exposures for which the PEPline
was consulted. Prompt consultation with experts, including the PEPline, can be essential to ensure that treatment, when
indicated, occurs within a time frame recommended by the guidelines.
|