558 
Implementation of an ART Access Program for HIV-infected Individuals in Resource-limited Settings: Clinical Results from 4 African Countries
P Sow1, C Otieno2, E Bissagnene3, C Kityo4, R Bennink5, F Wit5, E Waalberg6, T Rinke De Wit7, and Joep Lange*7
1Ctr Hosp Univ de Fann, Dakar, Senegal; 2Kenyatta Natl Hosp, Nairobi, Kenya; 3Ctr Hosp Univ de Treichville, Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire; 4Joint Clin Res Ctr, Kampala, Uganda; 5Intl Antiviral Therapy Evaluation Ctr, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 6Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland; and 7PharmAccess Fndn, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Background: Data on the effectiveness and safety of HAART
in resource-limited settings are limited. This study assessed the clinical
outcomes of HAART in African patients.
Methods: This open-label cohort program recruited 206
HAART-naïve HIV-1-infected patients in 4 urban clinics in Senegal (Dakar), Côte d’Ivoire (Abidjan),
Uganda (Kampala),
and Kenya (Nairobi). Treatment was a regimen of saquinavir/ritonavir (SQV/RTV) (1600/100 mg once daily), lamivudine (3TC) (150 mg twice daily), and zidovudine (ZDV) (300 mg twice daily). Primary outcome was
a plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load <400 copies/mL at
week 96. Secondary analyses included the change in CD4 cells between baseline
and week 96 and the occurrence of serious adverse events.
Results: At baseline, median age of the patient group
was 36 years; 38% were male; 35% of the patients was in CDC stage C; median CD4
cell count was 119 cells/mL
(IQR 70 to 225), and median plasma viral load was 304,210 copies/mL (IQR 79,572 to 695,000). High overall patient attendance
was observed, and 166 patients (81%) were still receiving HAART after 96 weeks.
In the early phase, however, attendance of clinic visits was poor in 1 of the
sites, but, from week 36 on this improved significantly. On-treatment (OT)
results are based on the number of evaluable patients
and the intent-to-treat (ITT) results, on the number of enrolled patients. At
week 96, 65%/52% (OT/ITT) of the patients had a plasma viral load <400
copies/mL. This proportion varied between the sites: while in Nairobi
and Dakar 51%/40% and 56%/46%, was found,
respectively, Abidjan and Kampala showed proportions of 69%/54% and
83%/69%, respectively. These proportions were statistically significant
different (a = 0.05)
between the sites (p = 0.0131/0.0217). Median increase in CD4 cell count was
198 cells/mL
(IQR 86 to 319), ranging from 191 to 292 cells/mL
between the sites. However, no statistically significant differences were
observed between the sites with respect to these numbers (p = 0.4312).
Between
8 and 96 weeks follow-up, 14 patients (6.8%) died, while 18 (9%) developed a
CDC C HIV-event in this period. Non-HIV-related serious adverse events were
reported in 55 patients (26.7%); 35 patients (17%) changed treatment for
toxicity reasons.
Conclusions: This program shows that the virologic and immunologic response to HAART in
resource-limited African settings can be as good as in western settings. However,
a statistically significant difference was observed between the sites with
respect to virologic success.
|