640
The Predictive Value of Pharmacokinetic-adjusted Phenotypic Susceptibility on Antiretroviral Response to Ritonavir-enhanced Protease Inhibitors in Subjects Who Failed Previous PI-based Regimens: ACTG A5126
Joseph J Eron*1, J G Park2, R Haubrich3, J Gerber4, S Yu2, H Wu5, and D Richman3,6
1Univ of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, US; 2Statistical and Data Analysis Ctr, Harvard Sch of Publ Hlth, Boston, MA, US; 3Univ of California, San Diego, US; 4Univ of Colorado Hlth Sci Ctr, Denver, US; 5Univ of Rochester Sch of Med and Dentistry, NY, US; and 6VA San Diego Hlthcare System, CA, US
Background: The in
vivo activity of an ART drug may depend on its plasma concentration
relative to the susceptibility of the virus.
Methods: This non-randomized, open-label study evaluated
the relationship of IQ (ratio of calculated protein binding-corrected plasma protease
inhibitor [PI] concentration at 12 hours [C12] to baseline IC50)
to week-2 and -24 virologic outcomes for 3 ritonavir (RTV)-enhanced PI regimens
chosen by site investigators. At entry, subjects had HIV RNA >2500 copies/mL
on a PI-based regimen for ≥12 weeks and phenotypic resistance to ≥2
PI. Following a phenotype (Monogram), their pre-entry PI was substituted with indinavir
(IDV)/RTV 800/100 mg, fosamprenavir (FPV)/RTV 700/100 mg, or lopinavir (LPV)/RTV
400/200 mg twice daily for 2 weeks. On day 14, a 12-hour pharmacologic evaluation
of PI was performed. Background therapy was then optimized using pre-entry
phenotype findings and follow-up continued for 24 weeks. Associations between
IQ and 2-week or 24-week change in viral load from baseline were examined by Spearmans
correlation test.
Results: We enrolled 53 subjects: 12 on IDV, 33 on FPV, and 8 on LPV, of whom 49
completed 2 weeks and 46 completed 24 weeks of study. Average baseline CD4
counts were 104 (IDV), 174 (FPV), and 231 (LPV) cells/mm3 and
average baseline HIV RNA were 5.0, 4.8, and 4.3 log10 copies/mL. The
median fold changes in IC50 for IDV, FPV, and LPV were 33, 72.5, and
157 in the IDV arm; they were 42, 12.0, and 79 in the FPV arm; and 16, 37, and 20.5
in the LPV arm. Median 2-week changes in viral load were 0.7, 0.1 and 1.0
log10 for the IDV, FPV, and LPV arms; median C12 were
806, 2060, and 6880 ng/mL and protein binding corrected IQ were 3.6, 2.0, and
2.4, respectively. Spearman r values
for 2-week correlation were 0.02, 0.45, and 0.38 for IDV, FPV, and LPV arms;
only the FPV arm value was significant (p
= 0.01). Correlations between baseline IC50 fold change and 2-week viral
load change were of similar magnitude; correlation for FPV was 0.57 (p = 0.001). Median 24-week changes in viral
load in the IDV, FPV, and LPV arms were similar (0.4, 0.3, and 0.3 log10,
respectively). Correlations between IQ and 24-week changes in viral load (0.03,
0.31, and 0.52) were not significant.
Conclusions: For RTV-enhanced FPV, 2-week viral load responses
correlated with calculated protein binding-corrected IQ, though correlation
with baseline IC50 fold changes was similar, suggesting that day 14
C12 added little incremental information. Evaluation of IDV and LPV
were limited by sample size. Pending analyses of measured free drug
concentrations may further describe the IQ/viral load relationship.
|